2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2016.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An equivariant index for proper actions III: The invariant and discrete series indices

Abstract: We study two special cases of the equivariant index defined in part I of this series. We apply this index to deformations of Spin c -Dirac operators, invariant under actions by possibly noncompact groups, with possibly noncompact orbit spaces. One special case is an index defined in terms of multiplicities of discrete series representations of semisimple groups, where we assume the Riemannian metric to have a certain product form. The other is an index defined in terms of sections invariant under a group actio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof The presence of the grading operator in means that D2=DG,K21+1DN2.Since the two terms on the right hand side commute, we therefore have etD2=et(DG,K21+1DN2)=etDG,K2etDN2.Lemma 4.1 in states that the Riemanian density dm on M equals the measure d[x,n] on G×KN induced by the product measure dxdn on G×N. Since K has unit volume, this implies that for all φCfalse(Gfalse)SfrakturpL2false(Gfalse)Sfrakturp and ψnormalΓfalse(SNW|Nfalse) such that φψ is K‐invariant, and xG and nN, left(etD2φψ)…”
Section: Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof The presence of the grading operator in means that D2=DG,K21+1DN2.Since the two terms on the right hand side commute, we therefore have etD2=et(DG,K21+1DN2)=etDG,K2etDN2.Lemma 4.1 in states that the Riemanian density dm on M equals the measure d[x,n] on G×KN induced by the product measure dxdn on G×N. Since K has unit volume, this implies that for all φCfalse(Gfalse)SfrakturpL2false(Gfalse)Sfrakturp and ψnormalΓfalse(SNW|Nfalse) such that φψ is K‐invariant, and xG and nN, left(etD2φψ)…”
Section: Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let ε be the grading operator on Sp. By Proposition 3.1 in , there is a Spinc‐Dirac operator DN on normalΓfalse(SNfalse) such that D is the operator DG,K1+εDNon . Here we use the metric Bp.…”
Section: Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, other versions of G-index theory, for non-compact M/G and G, have been developed elsewhere. This includes the work of Hochs-Mathai [17], [18], Braverman [8], and Hochs-Song [21], [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the third part [24], we consider Spin c -Dirac operators. For semisimple Lie groups with discrete series representations, the equivariant index is then directly related to multiplicities of discrete series representations, in cases where the Riemannian metric has a certain product form.…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%