1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf02478601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An equivalent diagram for the interface impedance of metal needle electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[Fe(CN) 6 ] 4À to the left direction with the rise in temperature. It is well known that the value of the capacitance depends on many factors, which include the electrode potential, the temperature, the ionic concentration, the types of ions, and the properties of the electrode surface [48]. The capacitance at the double layer formed, can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Fe(CN) 6 ] 4À to the left direction with the rise in temperature. It is well known that the value of the capacitance depends on many factors, which include the electrode potential, the temperature, the ionic concentration, the types of ions, and the properties of the electrode surface [48]. The capacitance at the double layer formed, can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been extensive modeling of the electrode-tissue interface that well characterizes the equivalent components of this interface [19], [23]–[25]. We include the following elements (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d H in water is around 2.8 E Â 10 À8 cm) (Bockris & Drazic, 1972). In reality, however, the double-layer capacitance is not constant with potential, and, for most electrode systems of practical importance, the capacitance in the absence of larger externally applied potential differences can be estimated as about 10 mF/cm 2 (Pollak, 1974a) or 15.9 mF/cm 2 (Bockris & Drazic, 1972) irrespective of the ratio of the ions (Bockris & Reddy, 1970). The GouyeChapman diffuse model (Bockris & Drazic, 1972) may present a better description of the double-layer structure, in which it was assumed that there would be no 'sticking' of ions to the electrode and no contact adsorption, and suggested a diffuse charge model as an addition to the Helmholtz theory.…”
Section: Electrode Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of applications, the effect of the diffusion layer can be ignored in order to simplify the solution (Cobbold, 1974;Pollak, 1974a). The simplified equivalent circuit is given as in Figure 2.5.…”
Section: Electrode Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation