1983
DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(83)90014-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An equation set for non-equilibrium two phase flow, and an analysis of some aspects of choking, acoustic propagation, and losses in low pressure wet steam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…solid particles) by simply inserting dm d /dt = 0. The equations presented in this section for the Eulerian-Lagrangian system are in agreement with the analogous equations presented in the Eulerian-Eulerian framework by Jackson & Davidson (1983).…”
Section: Coupling Termssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…solid particles) by simply inserting dm d /dt = 0. The equations presented in this section for the Eulerian-Lagrangian system are in agreement with the analogous equations presented in the Eulerian-Eulerian framework by Jackson & Davidson (1983).…”
Section: Coupling Termssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The local summations in (18)-(20) are necessarily grid-dependent functions; the summations are over all droplets (subscript α indicates the individual droplet variables; no summation over Greek indices) residing within a local numerical discretization volume (∆V α ) and employ a geometrical weighting factor, w α (discussed below). In the above form, the phase-coupling terms are in agreement with the derivations of Jackson & Davidson (1983) and Young (1995) for Eulerian dispersed-phase flow descriptions, and also with those of Mashayek (1998a,b) which were used to simulate the Lagrangian evolution of evaporating droplets in homogeneous turbulence. Note that neither of the first two citations addresses the evaluation of h V ,s , whereas Mashayek only considers flows for which the liquid and vapour heat capacities are equal and constant, in which case the correct evaluation of the vapour enthalpy is greatly simplified.…”
Section: Individual Droplet Conservation Equationssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This was because he did not define the relaxation time via an archetypal equation like ( 2 1 ) . The expression given by Jackson & Davidson (1983) is also incorrect for the same reason.…”
Section: At % (T-t)mentioning
confidence: 99%