2020
DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2020.1838736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An epistemic case for confucian democracy

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between democratic participation and the well-being of the people-a fundamental aim of Confucian government. It argues that although the value of democratic participation for people's moral cultivation may be dubious (as suggested recently by Sungmoon Kim), democratic participation is key to meeting other salient aspects of people's wellbeing. Drawing on developments in Western epistemic analyses of democracy, this paper shows that the complexity of political issues in deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, my focus is not so much on Confucian democracy’s epistemic credentials but on the Confucian arguments for political meritocracy based on service and reciprocity. As far as the epistemic dimension of Confucian democracy is concerned, I generally agree with Ziliotti (2020). I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for pressing me to clarify the scope of this paper.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…In this paper, my focus is not so much on Confucian democracy’s epistemic credentials but on the Confucian arguments for political meritocracy based on service and reciprocity. As far as the epistemic dimension of Confucian democracy is concerned, I generally agree with Ziliotti (2020). I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for pressing me to clarify the scope of this paper.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…For instance, Angle and Slote (2013) and Van Norden (2007) argue that Confucian ethics is a form of virtue ethics. 16 Despite the originality of this proposal, I believe such a legislative system would have significant epistemic limitations in practice and these limitations can undermine the performance of the bicameral system in nonideal situations (Ziliotti 2023).…”
Section: Framework Hybridity: Strong and Weak Normative Twiningmentioning
confidence: 99%