2020
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.2486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An epidemiological study of prevalence and comorbidity of non-clinical Dyslexia, Dysgraphia and Dyscalculia symptoms in Public and Private Schools of Pakistan

Abstract: Objective: Dealing with Dyslexia, Dysgraphia and Dyscalculia symptoms is a major challenge for teachers and school psychologists while addressing students’ issues. The present study was designed to examine the prevalence and comorbidity of specific learning disabilities (SLD) symptoms such as dyslexia, dysgraphia and dyscalculia in public and private schools of Lahore, Pakistan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in four schools of Lahore from June, 2019 to December 2019. We examined 666 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is done by assigning a set of characteristics to each study participant based on the information available (for example, age, gender, and educational status of the parents). As it appears in Figure 1, the prevalence of students with dysgraphia was 27% in the present study whereas non-dysgraphia students were 73% of the participants, which is consistent with Ashraf's [23] findings where the prevalence of dysgraphia showed 25%. However, according to previous studies, between 10% and 30% of children in schools have developed dysgraphia [24], while our findings are broadly consistent with the study by Ewain et al [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is done by assigning a set of characteristics to each study participant based on the information available (for example, age, gender, and educational status of the parents). As it appears in Figure 1, the prevalence of students with dysgraphia was 27% in the present study whereas non-dysgraphia students were 73% of the participants, which is consistent with Ashraf's [23] findings where the prevalence of dysgraphia showed 25%. However, according to previous studies, between 10% and 30% of children in schools have developed dysgraphia [24], while our findings are broadly consistent with the study by Ewain et al [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Various theories have been proposed to explain the differences in the prevalence of learning disabilities and difficulties between girls and boys. Biological vulnerability plays a significant role in the development of these disabilities and difficulties, and gender differences may be attributed to these vulnerabilities (Ashraf & Najam, 2017). Moreover, referral tendency may lead to these gender differences; i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 Also to manage specific learning disorders, it is necessary to screen children at initiation of schooling. 15 Hence, in the present study Urdu Receptive Language Scale (URLS) has been developed to assess the receptive language skills in infants and young children of 0-6 years. Special emphasis has been given to the fact that even in the assessment of preschool children both receptive as well as expressive language is assessed including assessment of more than one language dimension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%