1999
DOI: 10.1177/073428299901700406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Epidemiological-Cohort Study of DAS Processing Speed Factor: How Well Does it Identify Concurrent Achievement and Behavior Problems?

Abstract: This study evaluated the criterion-related validity for the Speed of Processing (SP) factor of the Differential Ability Scales (DAS; Elliott, 1990). The SP factor is comprised of one subtest score (Speed of Information Processing) based on results from factor analyses. Participants were an epidemiological sample (N= 1,400) stratified, within age levels, in proportion to census data on demography (e.g., race, gender, parents' educational levels). From this cohort, groups with unusual SP strengths and SP weaknes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reasoning applies also to the observation that information processing speed is indeed a viable marker for LD. Notwithstanding empirical research demonstrating that processing speed, in its continuous variable form, offers relatively trivial information in the shadow of more general cognitive ability (Oakland, Broom, & Glutting, 2000;Oh, Glutting, & McDermott, 1999;Riccio, Cohen, Hall, & Ross, 1997), one may conclude from the alternative perspective taken here that problems with information processing speed substantially increment risk for all types of low achievement, even after controlling for the alternative contributions of general cognitive ability and its subdomains (see Note 3). Processing speed problems play a much less prominent role with ability-achievement discrepancies, manifesting a risk only in the area of spelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This reasoning applies also to the observation that information processing speed is indeed a viable marker for LD. Notwithstanding empirical research demonstrating that processing speed, in its continuous variable form, offers relatively trivial information in the shadow of more general cognitive ability (Oakland, Broom, & Glutting, 2000;Oh, Glutting, & McDermott, 1999;Riccio, Cohen, Hall, & Ross, 1997), one may conclude from the alternative perspective taken here that problems with information processing speed substantially increment risk for all types of low achievement, even after controlling for the alternative contributions of general cognitive ability and its subdomains (see Note 3). Processing speed problems play a much less prominent role with ability-achievement discrepancies, manifesting a risk only in the area of spelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Some authors maintain that composite or factor scores are reliable and meaningful and can be used in profile analysis with corroborating evidence (Donders, 1996;Glutting, McDermott, Prifitera, & McGrath, 1994;McDermott, Fantuzzo, & Glutting, 1990;Oh, Glutting, & McDermott, 1999). Others contend that profile analysis at retained most of the subtests and indexes that are critical to the unique WISC-III profiles for children with high-functioning autism, ADHD, LD, and brain injury, but significant modifications were made in the composition of the indexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although there is no epidemiologic study on PBD in Asia, several studies from clinical samples reported that PBD is also prevalent in Asia. 1820 …”
Section: | Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%