2021
DOI: 10.1002/we.2679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An entrainment‐based model for annular wakes, with applications to airborne wind energy

Abstract: Several novel wind energy systems produce wakes with annular cross‐sections, which are qualitatively different from the wakes with circular cross‐sections commonly generated by conventional horizontal‐axis wind turbines and by compact obstacles. Since wind farms use arrays of hundreds of turbines, good analytical wake models are essential for efficient wind farm planning. Several models already exist for circular wakes; however, none have yet been proposed for annular wakes, making it impossible to estimate th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power equations for Fly-Gen and Ground-Gen AWESs are then derived by reducing the incoming wind of the induced velocities. They find that Fly-Gen AWESs have higher power generation potential compared to Ground-Gen. Kaufman-Martin et al (2021); Kheiri et al (2022) and Karakouzian et al (2022) study, with the aim of understanding the interaction of AWESs in a wind farm, the downstream AWES wake shape and characteristics with momentum and mass conservation considerations, finding a good agreement with CFD results. Gaunaa et al (2020) point out that using momentum theory to evaluate the induction of an AWES, which is described by 3D polars, is not physically consistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The power equations for Fly-Gen and Ground-Gen AWESs are then derived by reducing the incoming wind of the induced velocities. They find that Fly-Gen AWESs have higher power generation potential compared to Ground-Gen. Kaufman-Martin et al (2021); Kheiri et al (2022) and Karakouzian et al (2022) study, with the aim of understanding the interaction of AWESs in a wind farm, the downstream AWES wake shape and characteristics with momentum and mass conservation considerations, finding a good agreement with CFD results. Gaunaa et al (2020) point out that using momentum theory to evaluate the induction of an AWES, which is described by 3D polars, is not physically consistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We adopt the method proposed in [27] to obtain the wake radii and the average wake velocity from the CFD results presented in Section 2. The wake boundary (or width) in the radial direction at any streamwise coordinate ξ is considered as the point where the flow velocity reaches 99% of the freestream velocity-Kaufman-Martin et al [31] considered the surface where the flow velocity reached the freestream velocity as the wake boundary. The average wake velocity was also obtained by integrating the area under the velocity profile between the wake inner and outer radii.…”
Section: Comparison Between Cfd and Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the dimensionless counterpart of Equation ( 9) can be written as A simplifying assumption is to consider the flow velocity in the inner region to remain constant and equal to the freestream velocity, i.e., υ i = υ c = 1; a similar assumption was made in [31]. From CFD results presented in Section 2.4, it is seen that υ c may actually reach values above 1, which means that flow may accelerate inside the inner region; nevertheless, this increase of flow velocity is minimal and still the assumption of υ c = 1 may be reasonable.…”
Section: Cv1 Axis Of Rotation/symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For individual systems, recent investigations of flow induction and wake effects were performed, mainly considering axissymmetric AWES configurations in uniform inflows using either analyses based on momentum theory (Leuthold et al, 2017;De Lellis et al, 2018), vortex theory (Leuthold et al, 2019;Gaunaa et al, 2020) or the entrainment hypothesis (Kaufman-Martin et al, 2021), or high-fidelity CFD simulations (Haas and Meyers, 2017;Kheiri et al, 2018). Further numerical investigations of large-scale airborne wind energy systems in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) (Haas et al, 2019b) have shown that the wake development downstream of the system is considerable, hence suggesting that wake effects of utility-scale airborne wind energy systems can not be neglected when operating in parks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%