2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An enteric methane emission calculator (DREEM) built to consider feed diversity: Case study of pastoral and sedentary farming systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assumed that all terrestrial transportation is done by truck (average capacity between 16 and tones), due to the lack of train infrastructures in Qatar. Since the data on imports is from (Planning and Statistics Authority 2013) (see table S10 in the Supplementary Material), namely before the blockade of 2017, terrestrial transportation was assumed to take place within Qatar and between Qatar and the neighbor countries.…”
Section: Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that all terrestrial transportation is done by truck (average capacity between 16 and tones), due to the lack of train infrastructures in Qatar. Since the data on imports is from (Planning and Statistics Authority 2013) (see table S10 in the Supplementary Material), namely before the blockade of 2017, terrestrial transportation was assumed to take place within Qatar and between Qatar and the neighbor countries.…”
Section: Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, emissions from other upstream and downstream consumption and production processes are not included in the assessment [14]. An intermediate solution to address this fact is to consider many processes by using default data in order to create "calculators" or tools to estimate the environmental impacts of different production systems in specific places, assessing specific crop types or consumption patterns [15][16][17][18][19]. Even though these calculations might be not entirely precise [20,21], they are considered suitable when comparing production systems (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%