An Ensemble Optimization Framework for Coupled Design of Hydropower Contracts and Real‐Time Reservoir Operating Rules

Abstract

Revenues from hydropower generation often depend on the operator's ability to provide firm power in the presence of uncertain inflows. The primary options available for optimizing revenue are negotiation of a firm power contract before operations begin and adjustment of the reservoir release during operations. Contract and release strategy optimization are closely coupled and most appropriately analyzed with stochastic real‐time control methods. Here we use an ensemble‐based approach to stochastic optimization that provides a convenient way to construct nonparametric revenue probability distributions to explore the implications of uncertainty. The firm power contract is a simplified bilateral fixed price agreement that partially insulates operator and buyer from price fluctuations. The release control laws and firm energy target are jointly optimized to maximize the operator's expected revenue. Revenue probability distributions and related spill performance statistics indicate that predictive operating strategies such as stochastic dynamic programming and model predictive control can give significantly better performance than standard deterministic operating rules. The performance obtained from batch optimization with perfect inflow information establishes a convenient upper bound on potential revenue and provides a baseline for assessing the significance of differences between real‐time operating strategies. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the benefits of predictive operational strategies are greatest for reservoirs with medium nondimensional residence times and less important for reservoirs with large residence times. Overall, probabilistic analysis of the coupled hydropower contract‐operations problem provides a realistic way to assess revenue and risk for reservoirs that must provide firm power when inflows are uncertain.

The Multi‐Scale Dynamics of Groundwater Depletion

“…It would be more realistic to assume that the cooperative strategy operates in real time, optimizing pumping year‐by‐year, as we have assumed in the uncooperative case. Imperfect knowledge about the future could be accommodated by accounting for prediction uncertainty in the cooperative optimization procedure (Sahu & McLaughlin, 2018b). This real‐time version of a cooperative strategy could provide a better assessment of the practical advantages of regulation, as well as cooperation, when environmental and economic conditions are uncertain.…”

Evolutionary algorithm-based multiobjective reservoir operation policy optimisation under uncertainty

“…However, SDP has been referred to as having three curses (Giuliani et al 2016, Giuliani et al 2021: (I) multiple objectives-an inability to explicitly account for multiobjective tradeoffs, so a weighted sum method is often used (Soleimani et al 2016, Ortiz-Partida et al 2019, Celeste et al 2021; (ii) dimensionality-discretisation of the system state significantly increases computational cost when a large system is considered (Sahu, Mclaughlin 2018, Dobson et al 2019, Hooshyar et al 2020; and (iii) modelling-all variables need to be described in the simulation model, thus specific model and problem formulations are needed (Mortazavi et al 2012, Soleimani et al 2016, Sahu, Mclaughlin 2018, Dobson et al 2019, Ortiz-Partida et al 2019, Hooshyar et al 2020, Celeste et al 2021, which restrict its real-world applications.…”