An ensemble decision tree methodology for remaining useful life prediction of spur gears under natural pitting progression

Abstract

This article presents an ensemble decision tree–based random forest regression methodology for remaining useful life prediction of spur gears subjected to pitting failure mode. The random forest regression methodology does not require an elaborate statistics background knowledge and has an inbuilt health indicator selection capability compared to other existing data-driven remaining useful life prediction approaches. A correlation coefficient parameter based on the residual vibration signal is used for monitoring and detecting the pitting progression in spur gears. The effectiveness of the correlation coefficient of the residual vibration signal is assessed over the other existing health indicators for pitting fault progression. To show the inbuilt best health indicator selection capability of the random forest regression model, initially, eight indicators (existing seven and the correlation coefficient of the residual vibration signal) were used for model training. In addition, the effect of fusing the vibration sensor data from multiple positions on the gearbox on prediction accuracy of the random forest regression model is also evaluated. The accuracy in the remaining useful life prediction is found to increase after fusing the correlation coefficient of the residual vibration signal based health indicator derived from the accelerometers located at multiple positions on the gearbox in comparison to data from a single accelerometer. Furthermore, the accuracy of the proposed methodology is tested and proven using five accelerated run-to-failure experimental data collected from the specially built test rig.

Residual Stress Distribution Design for Gear Surfaces Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimization

“…These microcracks then propagate and merge into multiple macrocracks, which can form pieces of material removed from the bulk, i.e., pitting. Pitting can accelerate tooth surface deterioration [ 4 ], cause transmission error [ 5 ], and increase vibration and noise [ 6 ], etc. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the behavior of RCF.…”

Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Facility Infrastructure Failure and Remaining Useful Life Prediction

“…RF models use ensemble learning on the bagging method of decision trees, which are constructed using samples and a majority vote is taken for the prediction [20]. RF models are commonly known as strong performers for classification tasks (i.e., motor failure classification) [21], but also perform well with regression based predictions (i.e., motor RUL) [22]. The inputs of the RF model differs from those of the LSTM.…”

Structural damage quantification using ensemble‐based extremely randomised trees and impulse response functions

“…For classification problems, the majority vote of the classes is taken as the final output. A decision tree suffers from overfitting, resulting in a high variance, and RF reduces the variance by using multiple decision trees, bootstrapping the data and splitting nodes on the best split [32][33][34]38 from a set of randomly selected features. Although RF requires growing several decision trees using bootstrap data, it is still popular owning to low computational cost of growing the decision trees.…”