An enhanced approach for biomedical image restoration using image fusion techniques

Comparing Weibull Stress – Strength Reliability Bayesian Estimators for Singly Type II Censored Data under Different loss Functions

“…Best Estimators Performance (1) E for all sample sizes. 2W for n=15 with Jeffrey function, while E and Q are the best for n=30 and n=90 (3) and 4Q for all sample sizes, except for Jeffrey with n=15 (5) E and Q for n=30and n=90, while W is the best for Jeffrey with n=15 (6) W for n=15 and for Jeffrey with n=30, for the other cases E and Q are the best (7) and (8) by E and Q for all sample sizes, except W is the best for Exp. (8) for Jeffrey and gamma when n=15 Table 1 β and λ (as a special case in our research where the other cases can be done as a future work), then the probability distribution function for two independent Weibull r.v.…”

“…Various different lifetime distributions are considered to estimate R. (2)(3)(4)(5). As an example; Seuba et al (6) analyzed the applicability of the Weibull analysis to unidirectional microporous yttrium-stabilizedzirconia (YSZ) prepared by ice-tempting, performed crush tests on samples with controlled microstructural features with the loading direction parallel to the porosity.…”