2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 Mouse Line for Simultaneous Readout of Lineage Histories and Gene Expression Profiles in Single Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If concerns still remain about material transfer in lineage tracing, various recent single-cell lineage tracing tools should be implemented, involving either permanent genomic alterations (scGESTALT [CRISPR in zebrafish; ( Raj et al, 2018 )]; CLARIN [CRISPR in mouse; ( Bowling et al, 2020 )]; and Polylox [Cre-recombinase in mouse; ( Pei et al, 2017 )]) or somatic mutations ( Ludwig et al, 2019 ). Adoption of these tools will help verify previous lineage tracing studies and provide additional information on how cell state affects lineage decisions.…”
Section: Retinal Progenitor Cells—the Evolving Transcriptome Of Rpcs Across Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If concerns still remain about material transfer in lineage tracing, various recent single-cell lineage tracing tools should be implemented, involving either permanent genomic alterations (scGESTALT [CRISPR in zebrafish; ( Raj et al, 2018 )]; CLARIN [CRISPR in mouse; ( Bowling et al, 2020 )]; and Polylox [Cre-recombinase in mouse; ( Pei et al, 2017 )]) or somatic mutations ( Ludwig et al, 2019 ). Adoption of these tools will help verify previous lineage tracing studies and provide additional information on how cell state affects lineage decisions.…”
Section: Retinal Progenitor Cells—the Evolving Transcriptome Of Rpcs Across Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, pseudo-temporal ordering is difficult when differentiation to a specific cell type occurs over a wide range of time during development. Alternative approaches that aim at merging single-cell analysis with lineage relationships are rapidly evolving, using the estimation of transcriptional derivatives (RNA velocity) (La Manno et al, 2018), time series experiments (Fischer et al, 2019;Schiebinger et al, 2019), or by simultaneous direct recording of cell histories, with promising but still partial coverage (Bowling et al, 2020;Chan et al, 2019;Kalhor et al, 2018;Raj et al, 2018;Spanjaard et al, 2018). In principle, atlases can be constructed from samples that are staged using traditional methods (Cao et thus facilitating coarse-grained temporal modeling of inferred transcriptional states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, as in retrospective tracing approaches, computational approaches (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34) can reconstruct a phylogenetic tree that best models subclonal cellular relationships (e.g., by maximum-parsimony) from the observed shared or distinguishing alleles. Thus far, Cas9-enabled tracing has been successfully applied to study the cellular progenitor landscape in early mammalian embryogenesis (23,35), hematopoiesis (36), and neural development in zebrafish (22). Additionally, resources now exist for studying other phylogenetic processes in murine models (23,35), and analytical tools are available for computationally reconstructing and benchmarking trees from large lineage tracing datasets (33,37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%