1979
DOI: 10.1109/emr.1979.4306771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Engineer's Guide to Clear Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several offered tutorials in spelling and usage. Sarah Montoya treated the distinctions between single and double consonants and who and whom; Richard Nailen explained differences between words of similar spelling (for example, eminent and imminent) and meaning (imply and infer); and Robert Schoenfeld argued against using nouns as verbs [57][58][59][60]. Besides providing tutorials in mechanics, these contributors treated basic stylistic and organizational concerns.…”
Section: Contributors' Expanding Concept Of the Engineering Writer's mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several offered tutorials in spelling and usage. Sarah Montoya treated the distinctions between single and double consonants and who and whom; Richard Nailen explained differences between words of similar spelling (for example, eminent and imminent) and meaning (imply and infer); and Robert Schoenfeld argued against using nouns as verbs [57][58][59][60]. Besides providing tutorials in mechanics, these contributors treated basic stylistic and organizational concerns.…”
Section: Contributors' Expanding Concept Of the Engineering Writer's mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous contributors advised writers to achieve a simple, clear style by reforming their diction. For instance, Richard Nailen, Ethel Romm, Nick Tredennick and Brion Shimamoto, Jim Corey, Judith Bronson, and Carla Echols and Lois Pryor all discouraged writers from using the passive voice [59,[63][64][65][66][67]. These contributors assumed writers' ignorance of a stylistic principle long held and disseminated by teachers of writing, preference for the active voice, and sought to inculcate this principle in engineering writers.…”
Section: Contributors' Expanding Concept Of the Engineering Writer's mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' behaviours were the dependent variables for the study, A task analysis of the assembly and operating procedure was conducted by observing and recording the procedures performed by a technician on the design team and the designer. Instructions were developed from the task analysis and the aid of existing guidelines (Bieger & Glock, 1984-85;Booher, 1975;Braby, Kincaid, & McDaniel, 1982;Dixon, 1982;Hegarty, 1992;Hodgkinson & Hughes, 1982;Horton, 1994;Krull & Sharp, 2006;Kurata & Egenhofer, 2005;Nailen, 1981;Resnick, 1976;Stone & Glock, 1981;Szlichcinski, 1979;Tversky, et al, 2000). Six different instruction manuals were produced to coincide with the six experimental conditions in the study Appendix 1 shows an example of the text format in the first six pages of the manuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%