2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An energy sustainability metric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mix of clear policy signals and industry intentions drive the way for further energy reductions and efficiency improvement, their extent cannot be accurately determined a priori due to numerous reasons such as industrial scaling, financing requirements (e.g., capital expenditures), and time issues, among other. Sekulic et al (2014) proposed a metric for measuring the margin for improvement between the actual energy used and the theoretical minimum needed for the same task, using an example from the automotive industry. As noted by the authors, this gap is indicative of "the margin space to be populated by a transformational technology" (Sekulic et al, 2014, p.38).…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mix of clear policy signals and industry intentions drive the way for further energy reductions and efficiency improvement, their extent cannot be accurately determined a priori due to numerous reasons such as industrial scaling, financing requirements (e.g., capital expenditures), and time issues, among other. Sekulic et al (2014) proposed a metric for measuring the margin for improvement between the actual energy used and the theoretical minimum needed for the same task, using an example from the automotive industry. As noted by the authors, this gap is indicative of "the margin space to be populated by a transformational technology" (Sekulic et al, 2014, p.38).…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De la revisión bibliográfica, se destaca los siguientes artículos: Sekulic, analiza el consumo de energía real del proceso de soldadura fuerte de atmosfera controlada CAB (Controlled Atmosphere Brazing) de aluminio en intercambiadores de calor compactos, para la industria automotriz, en el que compara el punto de vista real y el mínimo teórico. En donde concluye que la energía real es 105 veces mayor que la mínima teórica (Sekulic, Nehete, Yu, & Fu, 2014).…”
Section: Estudios De Métricas Para Fabricación Sostenibleunclassified