2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An energy stable, hexagonal finite difference scheme for the 2D phase field crystal amplitude equations

Abstract: Please cite this article in press as: Z. Guan et al., An energy stable, hexagonal finite difference scheme for the 2D phase field crystal amplitude equations, J. Comput. Phys. (2016), http://dx. AbstractIn this paper we construct an energy stable finite difference scheme for the amplitude expansion equations for the two-dimensional phase field crystal (PFC) model. The equations are formulated in a periodic hexagonal domain with respect to the reciprocal lattice vectors to achieve a provably unconditionally ene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unconditional energy stability of the proposed scheme (3.8) follows the idea from the convex-concave decomposition of the energy, an idea popularized in Eyre's work [33]. The method has been applied to the phase field crystal (PFC) equation [41,89]; epitaxial thin film growth models [13,87]; nonlocal gradient model [43]; the Cahn-Hilliard model coupled with fluid flow [14,64], etc. Second-order accurate energy stable schemes have also been reported in recent years, based on either the Crank-Nicolson or BDF2 approach [6,7,22,23,42,44,48,81,90], etc.…”
Section: Numerical Scheme For the Reaction Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unconditional energy stability of the proposed scheme (3.8) follows the idea from the convex-concave decomposition of the energy, an idea popularized in Eyre's work [33]. The method has been applied to the phase field crystal (PFC) equation [41,89]; epitaxial thin film growth models [13,87]; nonlocal gradient model [43]; the Cahn-Hilliard model coupled with fluid flow [14,64], etc. Second-order accurate energy stable schemes have also been reported in recent years, based on either the Crank-Nicolson or BDF2 approach [6,7,22,23,42,44,48,81,90], etc.…”
Section: Numerical Scheme For the Reaction Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase-field crystal equation has been widely studied in the computational physics [51][52][53][54] and condensed matter physics literature [55][56][57]. Recently, the phase-field crystal model has been generalized to account for faster dynamics [58][59][60][61]; see [62] for details on the numerical treatment of the generalized equation.…”
Section: (A) Generalized Stefan Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, the layer normal is defined as a vector via the gradients , but this is only self-consistent when variations of ϕ are negligible. By explicitly considering microscopic density variation on the scale of individual layers 26 , 31 , 41 , these issues can be avoided with computational cost, but a hydrodynamic-scale theory that both circumvents these issues and considers only mesoscopic variations of the lamellar order has not previously been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This last equivalence relation is identical to Ψ → Ψ * . We note that equations such as the Swift-Hohenberg 38 , phase field crystals [39][40][41][42][43] and density functional theory [44][45][46][47] can model striped phases via a continuous field approach that goes beyond the traditional simplistic sinusoidal approximation. However, these all must resolve individual layers, necessarily limiting their applicability to short times and length scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%