2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-019-01232-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An energy-dissipation-based power-law formulation for estimating hemolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a tendency to neglect turbulence effects and use viscous stress only to formulate τeff when predicting hemolysis. 12,18 Nonetheless, as showed by Wu et al., 19 the predicted hemolysis in several benchmark cases with the formulation of τeff using viscous stress only correlated poorly with experimental results, with a correlation coefficient of merely 0.7192. There have been numerous studies that indicate the significant contribution of turbulence on hemolysis, and the significant influence of turbulence is commonly accepted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…There was a tendency to neglect turbulence effects and use viscous stress only to formulate τeff when predicting hemolysis. 12,18 Nonetheless, as showed by Wu et al., 19 the predicted hemolysis in several benchmark cases with the formulation of τeff using viscous stress only correlated poorly with experimental results, with a correlation coefficient of merely 0.7192. There have been numerous studies that indicate the significant contribution of turbulence on hemolysis, and the significant influence of turbulence is commonly accepted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In addition to the stress-based model, an energydissipation-based (EDB) power-law model proposed by Wu et al (2010Wu et al ( , 2020 was also employed. Compared with stress-based models, this model can improve the prediction of hemolysis for a wide range of flow conditions, especially turbulent flows.…”
Section: Hemolysis Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main cause of blood mechanical damage is the complex geometric structure and mechanical movement in blood pumps, which makes blood cells experience non-physiological stress which is much higher than normal physiological stress (Li et al, 2013). Turbulence and secondary flow will further increase the blood damage (Wu et al, 2020). Moreover, mechanical bearings result in friction and heating, bringing secondary damage to blood; the flow dead zone around mechanical bearing increases thrombosis risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason is that the flow becomes three‐dimensional, unsteady and turbulent due to rotation and curvature in the flow passage 27 . As a consequence of these considerations, the authors and also other researchers do include turbulent stresses in their blood damage prediction 9,17,28 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%