An Energy Cost Assessment of Future Energy Scenarios: A Case Study on San Pietro Island

Abstract

The need for a clean and affordable energy supply is a major challenge of the current century. The tough shift toward a sustainable energy mix becomes even more problematic when facing realities that lack infrastructures and financing, such as small islands. Energy modeling and planning is crucial at this early stage of the ecological transition. For this reason, this article aims to improve an established long-run energy model framework, known as “OSeMOSYS,” with an add-on tool able to estimate different types of Levelized Cost Of Electricity (LCOE): a real and theoretical LCOE of each technology and a real and theoretical system LCOE. This tool fills a gap in most modeling frameworks characterized by a lack of information when evaluating energy costs and aims at guiding policymakers to the most appropriate solution. The model is then used to predict future energy scenarios for the island of San Pietro, in Sardinia, which was chosen as a case study. Four energy scenarios with a time horizon from 2020 to 2050—the Business-As-Usual (BAU) scenario, the Current Policy Projection (CPP) scenario, the Sustainable Growth (SG) scenario, and the Self-Sufficient-Renewable (SSR) scenario—are explored and ranked according to the efforts made in them to achieve an energy transition. Results demonstrates the validity of the tool, showing that, in the long run, the average LCOE of the system benefits from the installation of RES plants, passing from 49.1 €/MWh in 2050 in the BAU scenario to 48.8 €/MWh in the ambitious SG scenario. On the other hand, achieving carbon neutrality and the island’s energy independence brings the LCOE to 531.5 €/MWh, questioning the convenience of large storage infrastructures in San Pietro and opening up future work on the exploration of different storage systems.

An Efficient Artificial Intelligence Energy Management System for Urban Building Integrating Photovoltaic and Storage

“…To evaluate whether the investment related to our solution could be viable or not, we decided to perform an economic analysis based on one of the well-known and most effective indicators in the PV and BESS energy system market: the Net Present Value (NPV). This metric indicates the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the current value of cash outflows under a period of time [62], [63], [64]. Moreover, further consideration of our analysis is based on [65], showing that tax deductions reduced the payback period for the investment and increased the annual savings from the energy storage systems.…”

Informing Sustainable Energy Policy in Developing Countries: An Assessment of Decarbonization Pathways in Colombia Using Open Energy System Optimization Modelling

“…OSeMOSYS is designed to be fully accessible, straightforward, and transparent for supporting long-term energy modelling in academia, industry, and governments [13,[33][34][35]. The framework has widely been used to support local [36][37][38], national [9,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], and regional [50][51][52] energy system assessments.…”