2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical weight-at-age approach reduces estimation bias compared to modeling parametric growth in integrated, statistical stock assessment models when growth is time varying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time-varying growth is speculated to have a significant effect on the population dynamics and overall biomass of a stock (Shin & Rochet, 1998;Rice, 2011) and it is increasingly suggested that plasticity of growth be recognised and accounted for in stock assessment and fisheries management (Kuriyama et al, 2016;Lorenzen, 2016;Stawitz, Haltuch & Johnson, 2019) as it can have potentially large and farreaching consequences for management decisions. The results of our Bayesian models are similar to those found by Thorson and Minte-Vera (2016) who performed a similar analysis on 25 species of marine fishes and found that a majority of them exhibited variation in year effects for growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Time-varying growth is speculated to have a significant effect on the population dynamics and overall biomass of a stock (Shin & Rochet, 1998;Rice, 2011) and it is increasingly suggested that plasticity of growth be recognised and accounted for in stock assessment and fisheries management (Kuriyama et al, 2016;Lorenzen, 2016;Stawitz, Haltuch & Johnson, 2019) as it can have potentially large and farreaching consequences for management decisions. The results of our Bayesian models are similar to those found by Thorson and Minte-Vera (2016) who performed a similar analysis on 25 species of marine fishes and found that a majority of them exhibited variation in year effects for growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of growth is central to fisheries manage ment and stock assessment procedures (Sparre & Venema, 1998). Historically, time-varying growth in stock-assessment models has been included as either empirical mass or length at age (Kuriyama et al, 2016;Lorenzen, 2016), but the recent push towards using integrated assessments recommends internally modelling as many processes as possible (Maunder & Punt, 2013). Within integrated assessments where growth is modelled internally the temporal variation in growth is often not taken into account (Stawitz, Haltuch, & Johnson, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bias in selectivity estimates can occur if data are pooled from stocks that have different responses to temperature (e.g. Concerns about changes in growth may be less important for assessment models (such as some cohort analyses) that use annual empirical information about weight-at-age rather than fitted and assumed growth curves (but data quality and quantity are critical, see Kuriyama et al 2015). A 20% underestimate in VB k will lead to ca 20% reduction in the estimation of yield-per-recruit biomass at fishing mortality F 0.1 (year À1 ) (the F value where the curve of production against fishing morality has a gradient of 10%) (Pardo et al 2013).…”
Section: Impact Of Life-history Trends In Single Species Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 20% underestimate in VB k will lead to ca 20% reduction in the estimation of yield-per-recruit biomass at fishing mortality F 0.1 (year À1 ) (the F value where the curve of production against fishing morality has a gradient of 10%) (Pardo et al 2013). Concerns about changes in growth may be less important for assessment models (such as some cohort analyses) that use annual empirical information about weight-at-age rather than fitted and assumed growth curves (but data quality and quantity are critical, see Kuriyama et al 2015). However, even for stocks managed using such models and data, projections about future stock dynamics may become biased if possible trends in growth and maturation are not considered.…”
Section: Impact Of Life-history Trends In Single Species Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, no recent population parameter values are available in the literature, so it is assumed that the values in Table 1 are valid. However, it has been suggested that "empirical weight-at-age approach is best applied to data-rich stocks for which growth is a difficult process to characterize" [15][16][17]. Estimates of growth rate, length-weight relationship, and natural mortality are necessary to transform catch data into number of organisms by age.…”
Section: Stock Dynamics and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%