2019
DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Validation of the Within-subject Biospecimens Pooling Approach to Minimize Exposure Misclassification in Biomarker-based Studies

Abstract: Background: Within-subject biospecimens pooling can theoretically reduce bias in dose-response functions issued from biomarker-based studies when exposure assessment suffers from classicaltype error. However, collecting many urine voids each day is cumbersome. We evaluated the empirical validity of a within-subject pooling approach and compared several options to avoid collecting all daily urine samples. Methods:In 16 pregnant women who collected a spot of each urine void over several nonconsecutive weeks, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also important to acknowledge the potential for exposure misclassification based on OPE metabolite measurements, particularly for women who provided only one urine sample, because of possible seasonal variability in urinary concentrations of OPE metabolites, and of measurement error in infant anthropometry. Nevertheless, our data collection methods (quantifying OPE metabolites in pooled urine samples collected throughout pregnancy; using the average of two to three measurements for each anthropometric outcome) are proven techniques to minimize such potential limitations (e.g., [21,75,76]). As with all environmental epidemiology studies, residual confounding by unknown or unmeasured co-exposures that influence the outcomes of interest may be present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to acknowledge the potential for exposure misclassification based on OPE metabolite measurements, particularly for women who provided only one urine sample, because of possible seasonal variability in urinary concentrations of OPE metabolites, and of measurement error in infant anthropometry. Nevertheless, our data collection methods (quantifying OPE metabolites in pooled urine samples collected throughout pregnancy; using the average of two to three measurements for each anthropometric outcome) are proven techniques to minimize such potential limitations (e.g., [21,75,76]). As with all environmental epidemiology studies, residual confounding by unknown or unmeasured co-exposures that influence the outcomes of interest may be present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since BPA is rapidly metabolized and excreted in urine, and exposure patterns are episodic, using one spot urine sample may lead to exposure misclassification. This means that when all studies in a given field are taken together, there is a greater tendency to obtain null results, the so-called attenuation bias [6]. In other words, most of the associations observed with behavior would be systematically underestimated.…”
Section: Emerging Patterns In a Growing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These should possibly consider much larger populations and rely on repeated biospecimens collection to limit exposure measurement error for the compounds with the strongest within-subject variability. 24,56,57 From a public health perspective, lead exposure during pregnancy (at the levels encountered in the years 1999-2010, when these pregnancies occurred) may still be a health concern in the EU while the effects of pregnancy exposure to parabens warrant further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%