1985
DOI: 10.1177/014662168500900205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Test of the Utility of the Observations-To-Variables Ratio in Factor and Components Analysis

Abstract: Many researchers have proposed a minimum ratio of observations to variables or an absolute minimum of observations in order to obtain stable factor configurations. However, hardly any empirical studies employing real data are available that attest to the tena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
232
1
17

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
232
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Principal axis factoring analyses were only conducted for the RHS-15 and RHS-13 self-rating versions because the subject-to-variable ratio of the RHS self-rating (5.73:1) is adequate, however, it is deficient for the RHS interview version (3.73:1; Arrindell & Van Der Ende, 1985). We used Kaiser’s eigenvalue (EV) criterion (>1), the scree plot, and parallel analysis (Patil, Singh, Mishra, & Donavan, 2007) to determine the factor structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal axis factoring analyses were only conducted for the RHS-15 and RHS-13 self-rating versions because the subject-to-variable ratio of the RHS self-rating (5.73:1) is adequate, however, it is deficient for the RHS interview version (3.73:1; Arrindell & Van Der Ende, 1985). We used Kaiser’s eigenvalue (EV) criterion (>1), the scree plot, and parallel analysis (Patil, Singh, Mishra, & Donavan, 2007) to determine the factor structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muchas de estas recomendaciones sobre el tamaño muestral han sido objeto de estudio a través de numerosos estudios empíricos y de simulación (Arrindell y van der Ende, 1985;MacCallum et al, 1999;Velicer y Fava, 1998), dónde se distinguen dos enfoques diferentes: 1) los que sugieren un tamaño mínimo (N), y 2) los que defienden la proporción de personas por ítem (N/p).…”
Section: Recomendación Clásicaunclassified
“…Adjectives were chosen as a basis for deriving structures of self-concepts as prescribed by the traditional lexical approach (Saucier & Goldberg, 1996). Only those person-descriptor adjectives used in at least 3.0% of all selfdescription text files were considered in order to roughly meet the multiple variables to cases ratio guidelines for factor analyses (For reviews, see Arrindell & van der Ende, 1985;MacCallum, Widaman, Zhang, & Hong, 1999). From this list, any words that were not adjectival person descriptors, including quantitative modifiers ( e.g., few, some), intensifying adjectives or adverbs (e.g., much, very), and spatial or temporal adjectives (e.g., low, past) were excluded.…”
Section: Text Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%