An empirical study on the scaffolding Chinese university students’ English argumentative writing based on toulmin model

Yang, Rui

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12199

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this research, it was not entirely possible to regulate all variables and experimental conditions rigorously. Therefore, it was categorized as a quasi-experimental non-randomized control group study, using a pre-test and post-test design because intact classes were used [ [84] , [85] , [86] , [87] ]. In this type of design, a pre-test is administered at the beginning of the study and post-test data is used to establish whether the participants in different groups are homogeneous or not [ 44 , 88 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating learning outcomes of Christian religious education learners: A comparison of constructive simulation and conventional method

Mugo,

Nyaga,

Ndwiga

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating learning outcomes of Christian religious education learners: A comparison of constructive simulation and conventional method

Mugo,

Nyaga,

Ndwiga

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…By comparing the argumentative essay to a predetermined set of criteria known as a rubric, a qualitative analysis may be performed. Language and rhetorical strategies, as well as readability and internal coherence, are all taken into account throughout the evaluation process (Kang, 2022). Different groups of students from the two countries' essay samples are analyzed in terms of the extent to which they use an argumentative format.…”

Section: Data Analysis Procedures and Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing The Argumentative Essay Formats of Indonesian and Korean Students Using the Toulmin Model

Dharmawan,

Ali,

Bayu Andika Prasatyo

et al. 2023

Onoma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study's overarching goal is to dissect and contrast the organizational framework of persuasive compositions generated by Indonesian and Korean (South Korean) pupils who are acquiring English as a secondary language, utilizing the Toulmin model as a theoretical framework for argument assessment. The research sample consisted of five participants from Indonesia, five participants from Korea, five female participants from Indonesia, and five female participants from Korea. Typically, individuals originate from diverse educational and vocational contexts. The articles generated by the authors served as the focal point of an analysis that employed elements of the Toulmin framework. The research's findings imply that there is no appreciable difference between men's and women's levels of reasoning in the two countries. It was evident that a discernible distinction among the participants was the absence of counterargument sections in certain individuals. This study holds significant importance in terms of examining the impact of cultural factors inherent in each nation and its language on the principles of argumentative writing. The results obtained from the investigation conducted in this research. can be employed to improve pedagogical strategies and facilitate the development of writing curricula that are culturally appropriate. It is anticipated that future investigations will facilitate the examination of additional linguistic and cultural attributes, as well as the broadening of the research's purview to encompass a more heterogeneous cohort hailing from a greater array of nations, as well as persons with differing levels of scholarly attainment.

show abstract

Global Citizenship: Towards a Concept for Participatory Environmental Protection

Hernández Guzmán,

Hernández García de Velazco

2023

Global Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An empirical study on the scaffolding Chinese university students’ English argumentative writing based on toulmin model

Cited by 4 publications

References 50 publications

Evaluating learning outcomes of Christian religious education learners: A comparison of constructive simulation and conventional method

Evaluating learning outcomes of Christian religious education learners: A comparison of constructive simulation and conventional method

Comparing The Argumentative Essay Formats of Indonesian and Korean Students Using the Toulmin Model

Global Citizenship: Towards a Concept for Participatory Environmental Protection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About