2009
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2009.1450460350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study on the sociality of tag selection on social bookmarking services

Abstract: This study attempts to characterize users' sociality in tagging by clustering factors that users consider when selecting tags for their bookmarks. Twenty-three frequent users of social bookmarking services were invited, and Q method and factor analysis have been applied in the study. Each cluster of users has varied focuses on personal, content, situational, and social factors when tagging. The study explores the four distinct types of sociality in tagging by the orientation of tag selection and the complexity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Sen et al [3] classified social tags into three levels, factual, subjective, and personal focusing on users' search tasks. Pu and Chang [4] extracted different types of social tags considering related factors such as personal, content, situational, and social factors using Qmethod and factor analysis. Golder and Huberman [5] categorized seven functions of tags, such as what it is about, what it is, and who owns it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sen et al [3] classified social tags into three levels, factual, subjective, and personal focusing on users' search tasks. Pu and Chang [4] extracted different types of social tags considering related factors such as personal, content, situational, and social factors using Qmethod and factor analysis. Golder and Huberman [5] categorized seven functions of tags, such as what it is about, what it is, and who owns it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%