“…At the same time, based on the previously mentioned strengthening of public facilities construction, in terms of return on inputs, terms of economic efficiency, the upfront investment in infrastructure construction is high, but the actual return on income takes a longer period, and at the same time, because public services are generally biased towards non-profit-making mode, it is difficult for local governments to make profits from them. This all objectively leads to the local financial income is not enough to cover the expenditure, and the government is difficulty to long-term investment in sufficient funds to support the construction of urbanization" [7]. This reflects that after the local government is burdened with huge economic expenditure pressure, even if it can give enough upfront inputs at one time, due to the long payback cycle, it is difficult for the government to make it sustainable in the mid-term and later inputs, which may lead to the implementation of the policy in the process of the local government to appear in the early enough, the mid-term lack of power, the later powerlessness This may lead to a situation in which the policies are implemented by local governments with sufficient strength in the early stage, weak in the middle stage, and weak in the later stage, making it difficult to form a long-term implementation mechanism, which objectively hampers the integration of migrant workers into cities.…”