2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study on knowledge integration, technology innovation and experimental practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of this data collection methods as sources of evidence are supported by other valid and reliable case studies (e.g. Hung, Kao, and Chu 2008;Battistella, De Toni, and Pessot 2017;Uhm, Sung, and Park 2018).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The application of this data collection methods as sources of evidence are supported by other valid and reliable case studies (e.g. Hung, Kao, and Chu 2008;Battistella, De Toni, and Pessot 2017;Uhm, Sung, and Park 2018).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For example, (Hung et al, 2008) explained that inter-firms collaborative product development and engineering knowledge are an important asset for technology-based industry in enhancing business strategy and product development in the global market. In fact, (Calantone et al, 2010) highlight that new product performance is a direct relationship on innovation and contributes firms in increasing firm performance.…”
Section: Discussion and Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…functional units, and collaboration focuses on the collective work across department (Grant, 1996;Hung et al, 2008;Kahn, 1996). (Alavi & Tiwana, 2002) define knowledge integration as the combination of individuals' focused on knowledge into situation-specific systemic of knowledge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasise the alliance for the product development phase and consider the case in which firms continue to jointly develop a product but compete individually in the market (Amaldoss and Rapoport 2005). The modelling framework in this study differs from the conventional inter-firm collaborative product development studies focusing on technology assessment Qin 2006, Tseng et al 2007), design alternative selection (Shen et al 2008, Zhang andChu 2009), knowledge sharing and knowledge integration considerations (Hung et al 2008, Chen 2010 or tactical decisions (prices and quantities) (Hung et al 2007, Yeh et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%