1984
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90310-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of the structure of the patrol/marking motivational system in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With one exception (Brown, 1978), studies have obtained objectmarking results inconsistent with the hypothesis. Our results and those of Birke ajid Sadler's (1984) first experiment demonstrated no sex differences in object marking, whereas two other studies reported more object marking by females than males (Birke & Sadler, 1984, Experiment 2;Lee et al, 1984). Supporting evidence for the hypothesis derives only from studies in which males mark conspecifics more than do females (Taylor, Bartko, & Farr, 1987;Taylor, Haller, & Bartko, 1984).…”
Section: Sexual Dimorphismsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With one exception (Brown, 1978), studies have obtained objectmarking results inconsistent with the hypothesis. Our results and those of Birke ajid Sadler's (1984) first experiment demonstrated no sex differences in object marking, whereas two other studies reported more object marking by females than males (Birke & Sadler, 1984, Experiment 2;Lee et al, 1984). Supporting evidence for the hypothesis derives only from studies in which males mark conspecifics more than do females (Taylor, Bartko, & Farr, 1987;Taylor, Haller, & Bartko, 1984).…”
Section: Sexual Dimorphismsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In Birke and Sadler's second experiment, estrous females marked at least two times more frequently than males. In addition, Lee, Mitchell, and Adams (1984) observed more frequent urine marking by females than males.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While I have argued that olfactory communication via urine marking in rats serves a sexual advertisement function (Brown, 1977(Brown, , 1986, other researchers have suggested that urine marking is a response to novelty (Hopp & Timberlake, 1983), a response to the familiarity of nonsexual social odors (Birke & Sadler, 1984), or a mechanism for advertising the reproductive state of the individual (Lee, Mitchell, & Adams, 1984). Socially experienced male rats mark more than do isolates (Experiment 2 of the present study), dominant males mark more than do subordinates (Adams, 1976), sexually aroused males mark more than do nonaroused males (Brown, 1986), and estrous females mark more than do diestrous females (Birke, 1978); these differences may reflect different levels of self advertisement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%