2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-006-6117-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of SOEs' market orientation in transitional China

Abstract: Using institutional theory, this paper investigates the antecedents and outcomes of market orientation in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in transitional China. A survey of 274 SOEs demonstrates a strong positive relationship between market orientation and various measures of organizational performance. Additionally, market competitive pressure, formalized corporate governance, and less government control are found to promote market orientation of SOEs in the transitional period. These results support the views… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, if it is national culture that primarily drives strategic choices, the intense reliance on interpersonal relationships may last a long time or at least will not experience a noticeable decline as market reforms deepen, since culture changes relatively slowly (Hofstede, 2007). On the other hand, if it is institutional (under)development that shapes strategic choices, we will probably see a gradually reduced role of interpersonal relationships and a heavier reliance on market-based capabilities as formal market-supporting institutions are gradually implemented (Ahlstrom, Bruton, & Yeh, 2007;Dieleman & Sachs, 2006;Li, Sun, & Liu, 2006b;White, 2000;Xu et al, 2006;Zhou & Peng, 2006;Zhou, Li, Zhao, & Cai, 2003). Evidence supportive of the institution-based view, articulated in Peng (2003), is now emerging.…”
Section: Growing the Firm In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, if it is national culture that primarily drives strategic choices, the intense reliance on interpersonal relationships may last a long time or at least will not experience a noticeable decline as market reforms deepen, since culture changes relatively slowly (Hofstede, 2007). On the other hand, if it is institutional (under)development that shapes strategic choices, we will probably see a gradually reduced role of interpersonal relationships and a heavier reliance on market-based capabilities as formal market-supporting institutions are gradually implemented (Ahlstrom, Bruton, & Yeh, 2007;Dieleman & Sachs, 2006;Li, Sun, & Liu, 2006b;White, 2000;Xu et al, 2006;Zhou & Peng, 2006;Zhou, Li, Zhao, & Cai, 2003). Evidence supportive of the institution-based view, articulated in Peng (2003), is now emerging.…”
Section: Growing the Firm In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents the ownership share of the largest owners in the firm (Li, Sun, & Liu, 2006;Thomsen & Pedersen, 2000). Some extant studies measure ownership concentration with the shares owned by the five or ten largest shareholders (Demsetz & Lehn, 1985), giving more weight to the five largest shareholders (Demsetz & Villalonga, 2001).…”
Section: Independent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…al, 2014) and a number of issues regarding these companies remain understudied (CuervoCazurra et al, 2014). Additionally, a limited number of previous studies have examined state ownership and internationalization decisions, and most of them focused on OFDIs by Chinese SOEs (Cui & Jiang, 2012;Ramasamy et al, 2012;Li, Sun, & Liu, 2006).…”
Section: View 3: Unique Aspects Of Governments As Owners In Soes' Intmentioning
confidence: 99%