1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00705573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of ethical predispositions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
146
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
146
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They considered utilitarian theories, theories of right and theories of justice and also they searched the difference between act and rule utilitarianism. Their findings will be discussed later, but here it is worth mentioning their comment, which is "Individual responses tended to be well thought out and somewhat complex" (Fritzche and Becker, 1984, p.169) This is somewhat consistent with Brady & Wheeler's (1996) findings that in regard to ethical predispositions, rather than the reasons that support the solutions people are "strongly biased toward solutions" and thus they drove the conclusion that their study "implies that utilitarianism and formalism are not best understood as forms of reasoning but as general behavior-orientations that can be independently rationalized" (Brady & Wheeler, 1996, p.937).…”
Section: A Fresh Apple or A New Barrel: Business Ethics From An Indivsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…They considered utilitarian theories, theories of right and theories of justice and also they searched the difference between act and rule utilitarianism. Their findings will be discussed later, but here it is worth mentioning their comment, which is "Individual responses tended to be well thought out and somewhat complex" (Fritzche and Becker, 1984, p.169) This is somewhat consistent with Brady & Wheeler's (1996) findings that in regard to ethical predispositions, rather than the reasons that support the solutions people are "strongly biased toward solutions" and thus they drove the conclusion that their study "implies that utilitarianism and formalism are not best understood as forms of reasoning but as general behavior-orientations that can be independently rationalized" (Brady & Wheeler, 1996, p.937).…”
Section: A Fresh Apple or A New Barrel: Business Ethics From An Indivsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Participants also completed scales measuring formalism (placing high value on following rules or principles) and consequentialism (valuing outcomes) from the Character Traits section of the Measure of Ethical Viewpoints (Brady and Wheeler, 1996). Participants indicated on a 7-point scale how important the following characteristics were to them: principled, dependable, trustworthy, honest, noted for integrity, law abiding for the formalism subscale and innovative, resourceful, effective, influential, results-oriented, productive, a winner for the consequentialism subscale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some authors have reached completely opposite conclusions, supporting instead the idea that gender has no significant influence on the ethical decision-making process (Brady & Wheeler, 1996;Browning & Zabriskie, 1983;Singhapakdi & Vitell, 1990). Hegarty and Sims (1978) assessed graduate business students and concluded that decision-making was not significantly influenced by gender but by other factors, such as individuals' beliefs.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%