An Empirical Study of Coexisting Relationships Between Area-Specific Support and Early Childhood Development

Wang, Jianjun; Henderson, Jamie; Harniman, Judith

doi:10.1080/01488376.2012.737449

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidence from the included articles, combined with knowledge of the Scandinavian model of preventive care, highlights many opportunities. First steps include norming the latest versions of the ASQ and ASQ:SE and then evaluating their impact in home‐visit, primary care medical, and early learning/preschool settings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review

Marks

Sjö

Wilson

2018

Develop Med Child Neuro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities. Method The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis. Results US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial. Interpretation Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts. What this paper adds General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%