2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl087581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Power Density‐Based Friction Law and Its Implications for Coherent Landslide Mobility

Abstract: The evolution of the shear resistance at the base of a coherent landslide body can effectively control its dynamic behavior. High‐velocity rotary shear experiments have allowed scientists to explore stress‐strain conditions close to those found in large landslides and faults. These experiments have led to two alternative models being proposed, which describe the evolution of the shear resistance through friction laws that depend either on normal stress or on velocity. Here, we discuss an integrated approach, f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 4, in the initial frictional weakening stage, a decrease in friction coefficient occurred, from a peak value of 0.69 consistent with Byerlee's range 0.6-0.85) to a steady-state coefficient of 0.17 (Byerlee, 1968;Deng et al, 2020). This frictional weakening behavior has been observed in various rocks and gouges, and it mainly depends on the normal stress and slip velocity (Chen et al, 2017;Del Gaudio et al, 2009;Hirose & Shimamoto, 2005;Hu, Yin, et al, 2018;Mizoguchi et al, 2007;Tsutsumi & Shimamoto, 1997) or on the power density, that is, the product of normal stress and velocity (Deng et al, 2020;Di Toro et al, 2011).…”
Section: Initial Weakening Stagesupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 4, in the initial frictional weakening stage, a decrease in friction coefficient occurred, from a peak value of 0.69 consistent with Byerlee's range 0.6-0.85) to a steady-state coefficient of 0.17 (Byerlee, 1968;Deng et al, 2020). This frictional weakening behavior has been observed in various rocks and gouges, and it mainly depends on the normal stress and slip velocity (Chen et al, 2017;Del Gaudio et al, 2009;Hirose & Shimamoto, 2005;Hu, Yin, et al, 2018;Mizoguchi et al, 2007;Tsutsumi & Shimamoto, 1997) or on the power density, that is, the product of normal stress and velocity (Deng et al, 2020;Di Toro et al, 2011).…”
Section: Initial Weakening Stagesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The energy conversion coefficient e will be discussed in section 3.4. Although there is a scaling law between high rotary experimental data and natural landslides (Deng et al, 2020), it may have little effect on the whole scope of the simulation in the light of the preliminary nature of the model.…”
Section: Initial Weakening Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all lines, the landslide type that is formed is a translational type caused by water entering the lower layer so that landslides occur. Incoherent landslides, the shape, and structure of the soil are unstable or the rock mass remains intact during the landslide [10] . Overall, landslides in the Gombel Hill area can be found at a depth of 5 m -6 m and are found at the contact between the clay and clay rock layers [11] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e friction heat change has a certain positive correlation with the velocity of elements in the scraping area. Related references show that the high temperature generated by frictional heat will weaken the friction effect and cause the elements' velocity to increase rapidly [52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%