2014
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-32-623-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical model of the auroral oval derived from CHAMP field-aligned current signatures – Part 2

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we introduce a new model for the location of the auroral oval. The auroral boundaries are derived from small-and medium-scale field-aligned current (FAC) based on the high-resolution CHAMP (CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload) magnetic field observations during the years 2000-2010. The basic shape of the auroral oval is controlled by the dayside merging electric field, E m , and can be fitted well by ellipses at all levels of activity. All five ellipse parameters show a dependence on E m … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous studies, the time‐integrated merging electric field ( E m ) can be expressed as Em(t,τ)=t1tEm(t)e(tt)/τdtt1te(tt)/τdt, where Em is treated as a continuous function of time t, t 1 is chosen 3 h before the actual epoch, and τ is the e ‐folding time of the weighting function in the integrands, with a value τ = 0.5 h. Richmond et al [] found that it is appropriate to consider the past 3 h of solar wind variations. An e ‐folding time of 0.5 h was also found suitable for calculating the merging electric field in previous ionospheric studies [ Xiong et al , ; Xiong and Lühr , ; Xiong et al , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…According to previous studies, the time‐integrated merging electric field ( E m ) can be expressed as Em(t,τ)=t1tEm(t)e(tt)/τdtt1te(tt)/τdt, where Em is treated as a continuous function of time t, t 1 is chosen 3 h before the actual epoch, and τ is the e ‐folding time of the weighting function in the integrands, with a value τ = 0.5 h. Richmond et al [] found that it is appropriate to consider the past 3 h of solar wind variations. An e ‐folding time of 0.5 h was also found suitable for calculating the merging electric field in previous ionospheric studies [ Xiong et al , ; Xiong and Lühr , ; Xiong et al , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Compared to the work by Gussenhoven et al (), the deviation between the model and the empirical data is small. The radius for Kp = 0 can easily be compared to the radius from Xiong & Lühr () when using the values for E m = 0. From the presented parameters, we calculated the radius of the ellipse by using eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the presented parameters, we calculated the radius of the ellipse by using eq. 3 in Xiong & Lühr (). The radius for each boundary on both hemispheres was calculated in 24 magnetic local time bins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Em is treated as a continuous function of time t, t 1 is chosen 3 h before the actual epoch, and τ is the e ‐folding time of the weighting function in the integrands, with a value τ = 0.5 h. A similar approach for calculating the merging electric field has been used in our previous studies [ Xiong et al , ; Xiong and Lühr , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%