An empirical investigation of the relationship between e-government development and the digital economy: the case of Asian countries

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate and comprehend the nature of the relationship between e-government development and the digital economy. Design/methodology/approach A multidimensional research paradigm is developed on the basis of the technology adoption model and Fountain’s technology enactment theory. The model is empirically examined using a regional study of 20 Asian countries. Findings A positive two-way relationship between e-government development and the digital economy has been indicated by the findings. Moreover, along with social, economic, political, technological and demographic factors, certain national cultural characteristics have significant effects on the digital economy and e-government development. Research limitations/implications One of the key limitations of the study is that it is based on publicly available secondary data. Therefore, some degree of caution should be kept in mind when making generalisations about the findings of this study. Originality/value The contribution of this study is that it provides a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the dynamic association between e-government development and the digital economy by providing aid to policymakers in understanding the nature of dynamic relationships between the digital economy, government organisations and citizens’ adoption of technologies.

How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda

“…One of the topics that we have not discussed in any depth is the extent to which digital economy technologies can support useful information service platforms for citizens ( Zhao et al, 2015 , Ali et al, 2018 ). Many governments – whether municipal, county or federal – are willingly making their data available to citizens and researchers.…”

“…With international digitalization and informatization now entering an innovation- and information-driven era of fuller penetration due to cross-border innovation and accelerated development, the digital economy truly has become a new engine of economic growth ( Curran, 2018 , Gomber et al, 2018 , Brynjolfsson and Collis, 2019 ). In recent years, the digital economy has made great progress in Asian countries, rather than just in the Western world, spurring the integration of digital technology and traditional economy activities ( Ali et al, 2018 , Taglioni and Winkler, 2016 ).…”

A machine learning approach to the digitalization of bank customers: Evidence from random and causal forests

“…Digitalization is not a single dimensional technological expansion but a multifaceted phenomenon. While literature about the global digitalization of societies has examined several dimensions of the digitalization process [ 55 – 57 ], previous studies on the financial digitalization of consumers have mainly focused on the adoption of online channels. As the OECD has suggested, it is convenient to apply a examine a number of dimensions to explore the digital transformation of bank customers.…”

Critical informational infrastructure as object of a criminal offence

“…Как показывает мировая практика, для развития цифровой экономики в Российской Федерации необходимо внедрение новых подходов в регулирование общественных отношений, осуществляемых посредством информационных технологий [8,9]. При переходе к цифровой экономике происходят принципиальные изменения в структуре всех общественных отношений, их объектно-субъектного состава и условий реализации [6].…”