2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical examination of the science–technology relationship in the biotechnology industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This calls for an investment in basic research and an increase in collaborations with scientific institutions. R&D collaboration with scientific institutions such as universities generates advantages due to knowledge spillover (Cassiman et al 2008;Subramanian and Soh 2010). These joint research should continue for retaining communication channels through informal contact between researcher and scientists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This calls for an investment in basic research and an increase in collaborations with scientific institutions. R&D collaboration with scientific institutions such as universities generates advantages due to knowledge spillover (Cassiman et al 2008;Subramanian and Soh 2010). These joint research should continue for retaining communication channels through informal contact between researcher and scientists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Science can foster innovation and, through the explanation and understanding of natural phenomena, provides insight for solving technological problems occurring during the research and development (R&D) process (Gibbons and Johnston 1974;Dalrymple 2003). In this sense, previous literature has increasingly focused on the effects and importance of science for innovation (Van Vianen et al 1990;Brooks 1994;Tijssen 2002;Verbeek et al 2002;Gittelman and Kogut 2003;Cassiman et al 2008;Caraça et al 2009;Subramanian and Soh 2010). The common notion found in these studies is that science assists in solving difficulties in the invention process and, as a result, positively influences innovation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low level of pay and high labor productivity may be extra competitive in the national manufacturing industry because of low labor cost per unit. However, empirical research confirmed that the low level of the national manufacturing industry corresponds to low technical content (Subramanian and Soh 2010). Low labor cost per unit of manufacturing is not advantageous because it only relies on low-cost labor.…”
Section: Key Cost Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to accessing greater resources, knowledge integration (Subramanian and Soh, 2010) or the recombination of components to produce valuable technologies is a fundamental organizational function that may contribute to the timeliness of inventions. An organization's existing knowledge base impacts its ability to generate new valuable combinations in the form of various innovations (Fleming and Sorenson, 2004;Galunic and Rodan, 1998;Yayavaram and Ahuja, 2008).…”
Section: Temporal Advantages In Inventingmentioning
confidence: 99%