2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical evaluation of similarity measures for time series classification

Abstract: Time series are ubiquitous, and a measure to assess their similarity is a core part of many computational systems. In particular, the similarity measure is the most essential ingredient of time series clustering and classification systems. Because of this importance, countless approaches to estimate time series similarity have been proposed. However, there is a lack of comparative studies using empirical, rigorous, quantitative, and large-scale assessment strategies. In this article, we provide an extensive ev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [20,21], principal component analysis and similarity measures for time series evaluation of generic data are discussed. The conclusions are applicable to smart meter data, although the method works best with fewer meters than recordings and thus, conversely, the dataset expands.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20,21], principal component analysis and similarity measures for time series evaluation of generic data are discussed. The conclusions are applicable to smart meter data, although the method works best with fewer meters than recordings and thus, conversely, the dataset expands.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we do not intend to compare the performance of different classifiers and similarity metrics (which have been empirically studied in [26]). We rely in our study on the most frequently used classification method: Nearest Neighbor Classification (1NN) with DTW distance.…”
Section: Setup and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to its maturity and performance, DTW based 1NN classification has become one of the most prominent TSC approaches. Although recent empirical comparison [23] reveals that the Time Warp Edit Distance (TWED) [15] performs statistically more accurate than DTW. Other common distance measures include Euclidean distance, Edit Distance on Real sequence (EDR) [5] and Minimum Jump Cost (MJC) [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%