1990
DOI: 10.1080/09558543.1990.12031185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Evaluation of Hypertext Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, 20, 31], but the usability of hypertext authoring systems is largely understudied. Early work by Boyle, Teh and Williams [1] suggested that the systems with the simplest models are easiest to use (as measured by authoring speed), as seems to be the case with wiki. Elliott, Jones and Barker [8] proposed to use grounded theory to study the learnability of hypertext systems, but otherwise provided only very general findings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2, 20, 31], but the usability of hypertext authoring systems is largely understudied. Early work by Boyle, Teh and Williams [1] suggested that the systems with the simplest models are easiest to use (as measured by authoring speed), as seems to be the case with wiki. Elliott, Jones and Barker [8] proposed to use grounded theory to study the learnability of hypertext systems, but otherwise provided only very general findings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our literature review clearly indicates a paucity of empirical hypermedia research in the target areas, with the following examples representative of work at least falling in related areas. Empirical studies have examined authoring and browsing speed for novice users in an information storage and retrieval context [7], effects of hardware technologies [ 111, [ 181, [31], [32], and hypertext as a replacement for paper computer user manuals [35]. Shneiderman has conducted a number of experiments in hypertext usability, chiefly related to information retrieval (e.g., 1361).…”
Section: Various Information Retrieval and Subjectivementioning
confidence: 99%