2015
DOI: 10.1107/s1600576715020440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical correction for the influence of low-energy contamination

Abstract: Low‐energy contamination caused by focusing multilayer optics has been known for a long time. So far, the only method to avoid this problem is attenuation by interposition of a low‐density material foil into the beam. However, attenuation lowers the intensity, which might be crucial, especially for charge density data collection, and is of course not possible for already measured data. In this article, an empirical correction is proposed as an alternative or addition. The low‐energy contamination mainly affect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
100
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors attribute these to "incoherent scattering from components in the monochromator and mounting" [9] p. 1425. They appear very similar to features observed on some X-ray patterns recorded using Mo sealed-tube microsources monochromated with doubly reflecting multilayer mirrors [17,18]. In either case, being radially oriented, these streaks cannot be interpreted as disorder or thermal diffuse scattering but must be attributed to a lack of monochromaticity in the incident beam.…”
Section: Measurement Of Diffuse Scattering On a Reactor Sourcesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The authors attribute these to "incoherent scattering from components in the monochromator and mounting" [9] p. 1425. They appear very similar to features observed on some X-ray patterns recorded using Mo sealed-tube microsources monochromated with doubly reflecting multilayer mirrors [17,18]. In either case, being radially oriented, these streaks cannot be interpreted as disorder or thermal diffuse scattering but must be attributed to a lack of monochromaticity in the incident beam.…”
Section: Measurement Of Diffuse Scattering On a Reactor Sourcesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…All data were integrated with SAINT . A multi‐scan absorption correction (SADABS) and a 3λ correction were applied . The structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXT) and refined on F 2 using the full‐matrix least‐squares methods of SHELXL within the SHELXLE GUI .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0711), R 1 = 0.0401 [I > 2s(I)], wR 2 = 0.1044 (all data), res.d ensity peaks:0.381 and À0.280 eA À3 . [24] Am ulti-scan absorption correction and a3 l correction [25] were applied using SADABS. [23] Thed ata were integrated with SAINT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%