2011
DOI: 10.5121/ijitcs.2011.1408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Comparison Of Supervised Learning Algorithms In Disease Detection

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although other works, for example, [11], [12][14], [15], are more accurate than MPD-FNA-Fuzzy, they use ten descriptors, while the MPD-FNA-Fuzzy uses only four descriptors, two of which are extracted indirectly from WDBC, which simplifies the model and streamlines processing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although other works, for example, [11], [12][14], [15], are more accurate than MPD-FNA-Fuzzy, they use ten descriptors, while the MPD-FNA-Fuzzy uses only four descriptors, two of which are extracted indirectly from WDBC, which simplifies the model and streamlines processing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing area of research relates to the use of techniques from Computational Intelligence (CI) applied to the processing of information necessary for the medical diagnosis. We can cite as examples, [3-15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a number of machine learning and statistical modeling approaches that so far have been involved in various aspects of solving the problem. According to [3], although other classifiers perform well, the SVM outperforms other classifiers with respect to accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision. This paper presents a joint Matlab implementation of the SVM and Naïve Bayes methods in a new dataset acquired from the patients examined for diabetes in Kosovo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More xploiting the same en after[29]) cross Weka. They are terms of confusion10 in terms of four the proportion of algorithm Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%