1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00435740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
208
1
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
208
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research recognized the positive influence of brand equity on: consumer preference and purchase intention (Cobb-Walgren, Ruble, and Donthu 1995), consumer perception of product quality (Dodds, Monroe, and Grewal 1991), consumer evaluation of brand extensions (Aaker and Keller 1990), consumer price insensitivity (Erdem, Swait, and Louviere 2002), market share (Agarwal and Rao 1996), shareholder value (Kerin and Sethuraman 1998), and resilience to product-harm crisis (Dawar and Pillutla 2000).…”
Section: Brand Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research recognized the positive influence of brand equity on: consumer preference and purchase intention (Cobb-Walgren, Ruble, and Donthu 1995), consumer perception of product quality (Dodds, Monroe, and Grewal 1991), consumer evaluation of brand extensions (Aaker and Keller 1990), consumer price insensitivity (Erdem, Swait, and Louviere 2002), market share (Agarwal and Rao 1996), shareholder value (Kerin and Sethuraman 1998), and resilience to product-harm crisis (Dawar and Pillutla 2000).…”
Section: Brand Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Favorable brand associations offer several benefits to consumers which can be replicated to destination brand visitors. For instance, favorable brand associations influence consumers' intention to visit a historical place, generate references to others, and increase their willingness to pay a premium (Agarwal & Rao, 1996). Brand associations assist consumers in organizing and retrieving brand-related information from their memory, leading to the realization of a reason to buy a specific brand (Aaker, 1996).…”
Section: Brand Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Likert-type scale of 1 to 7 was adopted for all construct measures, using the anchors "strongly disagree" (1) and "strongly agree" (7). The measures for brand associations construct have been empirically tested (Agarwal and Rao, 1996;MacKay, 2001) and used in a number of studies (e.g. Yoo and Donthu, 2001;Pappu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Measures Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%