2004
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks

Abstract: Using computer simulations, we investigate the sensitivity (power) and specificity (true negative rate) of the proposed framework to estimate GGMs from microarray data. This shows that it is possible to recover the true network topology with high accuracy even for small-sample datasets. Subsequently, we analyze gene expression data from a breast cancer tumor study and illustrate our approach by inferring a corresponding large-scale gene association network for 3883 genes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
594
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 688 publications
(610 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
594
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A major concern when evaluating relationships between genes based on their expression is that transcriptional co-regulation among many genes can give rise to indirect interaction effects in expression data, 36 and regular correlation networks cannot distinguish direct from indirect relationships. 37,38 To control for the indirect effects, we employed the approach developed by Schafer and Strimmer 36 based on the graphical Gaussian model (GGM) 39 to reconstruct a GGM network.…”
Section: Coordinated Expression Of Mtdna Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major concern when evaluating relationships between genes based on their expression is that transcriptional co-regulation among many genes can give rise to indirect interaction effects in expression data, 36 and regular correlation networks cannot distinguish direct from indirect relationships. 37,38 To control for the indirect effects, we employed the approach developed by Schafer and Strimmer 36 based on the graphical Gaussian model (GGM) 39 to reconstruct a GGM network.…”
Section: Coordinated Expression Of Mtdna Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these large-scale expression data sets, we compare the resultant networks from graphical Gaussian models (GGMs) [11] and the proposed algorithm. The synthetic expression data are generated by SynTReN [16], which is well suited for the purpose of testing network learning strategies [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 3 in the supplement file, we evaluate two widely used methods for inference from gene expression data and as a result choose partial correlation of gene expression data for the proposed framework. Partial correlation (PCOR) is indicative of direct interactions between a pair of variables/genes by eliminating the effects from the rest of variables/genes and therefore has been popular in the research towards the inference of gene regulatory relationship [11]. In other words, if the residuals of two time series, after removing the effect from the rest of the data by regression, are still correlated, there exists direct interaction between them.…”
Section: Bayes Random Fields (Brfs) Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods were assessed according to a scoring system (AUROC) that evaluates the number of false positives and correct answers as a smooth function of the acceptance threshold. The methods considered in the paper all infer causal networks, and include most of the well-known methodologies, such as Graphical Gaussian Models (GGM, [21], [7]), Sparse Regression (Lasso [22] and Elastic Net [24]), Time-varying Sparse Regression (Tesla [2]), Hierarchical Bayesian Regression models (HBR, [1]), Non-Homogeneous Hierarchical Bayesian models ( [11]), Automatic Relevance Determination in the context of Sparse Bayesian Regression (ARD-SBR, [20]), Bayesian Spline Autoregression (BSA, [17]), State Space Models (SSM, [3]), Gaussian processes (GP, [4]), Mutual information methods (ARACNE, [16]), Mixture Bayesian network models (MBN, [14]), and Gaussian Bayesian networks (BGe, [9]). Data were simulated using the computational model proposed by the Millar's group (Millar2010, [19]), in both deterministic and stochastic settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%