An empirical approach for optimizing globally distributed software product engineering

Das, Bhaskarjyoti

doi:10.1109/icacci.2017.8126027

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Disregarding exclusively following the recommended programming building forms, regularly the circulated groups neglect to go about as a solitary item group. The key speculation in this approach is the suspicion that most dispersed programming item designing groups in a similar association requires arrangement as opposed to base up retooling as a detailed programming building activity and this arrangement can be accomplished in a quick and successful way by adjusting the key interface pioneers [34].…”

Section: Forward Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An empirical approach for software reengineering process with relation to quality assurance mechanism

Muzammul

Awais²

2018

ADCAIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Muhammad Muzammul and Dr. M. AwaisAn empirical approach for software reengineering process with relation to quality assurance mechanism ADCAIJSoftware development advances focus on productivity of existing software systems and quality is basic demand of every engineering product. In this paper we will discuss complete reengineering process with aspects of forward, reverse and quality assurance mechanism. As we know the software development life cycle (SDLC) follows a complete mechanism of engineering process. In forward engineering we tried to follow selective main phases of software engineering (data,requirements,design,development,implementation). Inreverse engineering we move backward from the last phase of developing product as it gather requirements from implemented product (implementation, coding, design,requirements,data).During reengineering we add up more quality features on customer demands, but the actual demand is to fulfill quality needs that can be assured by external as well as internal quality attributes such as reliability, efficiency, flexibility, reusability and robustness in any software system. We discussed a methodological approach to move from reengineering to the journey of quality assurance. More than 50 studies come into discussion and throughput results proposed by graph and tabular form. We can say if the reengineering process produce quality attributes, then it can be said by old software system refactoring as code refactoring, data refactoring and architectural refactoring we obtained a quality products at lower cost instead of new software system development, which causes decrease in quality attributes as cost, time etc. In future work testing methodology can be proposed for quality assurance.Muhammad Muzammul and Dr. M. Awais An empirical approach for software reengineering process with relation to quality assurance mechanism ADCAIJAn empirical approach for software reengineering process with relation to quality assurance mechanism ADCAIJ

show abstract

Section: Forward Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Vol. 7 N. 3 (2018), [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] performance of system architecture failed to work out. We try to move with technology advancements and available hardware [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An empirical approach for software reengineering process with relation to quality assurance mechanism

Muzammul

Awais²

2018

ADCAIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Outsourcing, for instance, is extensively being used in the software industry since it brings about many economic benefits. For example, availability of skilled labor, reduced time and effort to market, accessibility of a diverse talent pool, and the opportunity to grow in the local market are few of the more known and tangible benefits 6,7 . These apparent advantages of the global software development (GES), however, do come with certain downsides.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, availability of skilled labor, reduced time and effort to market, accessibility of a diverse talent pool, and the opportunity to grow in the local market are few of the more known and tangible benefits. 6,7 These apparent advantages of the global software development (GES), however, do come with certain downsides. In fact, quite a few challenges have been identified in the past literature-all stemming from differences in geographical location, culture and norms, languages, time zones, knowledge management, communication and coordination, 6,8,9 and trust level between the team members.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…20,21 Using online simulation and games 21 to increase collaboration between team members has recently gained prominence. 7,22 Mimicking geographical distance 11 between various players playing at different locations and receiving instant feedback 23 serves an important role in understanding GSE challenges. GSE practice relates to attitude and behavior, for example, in accepting differences and the ability to read context.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Counteracting sociocultural barriers in global software engineering using group activities

Yasin

Fatima

Khan

et al. 2023

J Software Evolu Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In modern times, internationally organized teams face a number of coordination problems owing to their different physical operating locations. These challenges usually come in temporal, cultural, and linguistic forms. To resolve some of these issues, we need more coordination, teamwork, and shared understanding in the requirements engineering phase. Many approaches have been introduced to overcome these challenges associated with global software engineering (GSE). The objective of this research study is to introduce amateurs to GSE and improve their understanding of its associated challenges through an activity‐based learning approach. Our method is primarily targeted toward students who already have theoretical knowledge on the topic but require first‐hand experience with GSE. With the aforementioned motivation in mind, we propose, designe, and empirically evaluate two different activities that can help enhance awareness of GSE challenges. For each activity, we simulate an environment wherein participants are made to go through various constructed coordination challenges related to communication, time management, team mistrust, linguistic barriers, cultural barriers, and distribution of tasks. The effectiveness of our proposed activities, captured by the extent to which participants were able to deal with GSE challenges, was judged through various techniques including (i) observation, (ii) post activities survey questionnaire, and (iii) brainstorming and discussion. We show that the proposed activities were effective in helping students learn and further their understanding of GSE concepts. In particular, discussion sessions and survey questionnaire results reflect their ability to identify critical GSE challenges (specifically related to teams) in a simulated scenario.

show abstract

An empirical approach for optimizing globally distributed software product engineering

Cited by 2 publications

References 27 publications

An empirical approach for software reengineering process with relation to quality assurance mechanism

An empirical approach for software reengineering process with relation to quality assurance mechanism

Counteracting sociocultural barriers in global software engineering using group activities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About