2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/qrs.2017.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Analysis of Three-Stage Data-Preprocessing for Analogy-Based Software Effort Estimation on the ISBSG Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data pre-processing techniques include reduction, projection, and missing data techniques (MDTs). Data reduction decreases the data size via, for example, feature selection (FS) or dimension reduction [12].…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data pre-processing techniques include reduction, projection, and missing data techniques (MDTs). Data reduction decreases the data size via, for example, feature selection (FS) or dimension reduction [12].…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…kNNI is a well-known and computationally simple method for missing data imputation that uses observations in the environment to account for missing values [15][16][17][18]. In addition, kNN can predict categorical or numeric attributes using the value of mode/mean or median [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For empirical validation, the ML algorithm is routinely tested on the SEE datasets. The use of data preprocessing (DP) techniques as a fundamental step in helping to increase machine learning performance [15,16,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have tried to modify new models using machine learning to improve accuracy in software effort estimation [3] [15] [16] [17]. Using a based feature selection [18] [19] [20] [21], or parameter optimization [22] [23][24]. Some prediction techniques have been suggested but none have proved consistently successful in predicting software development efforts [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%