The last decade has seen a significant increase in asylum claims based on religious conversion not only in the Nordics but also in also other European countries. The majority of these cases concern Afghan and Iranian nationals, and many emerge after the first instance refusal, making them sur place claims. This may reflect both a growing need for international protection for persons abandoning or changing their religion in these countries – something supported by relevant country of origin information – but also a stronger interest in conversion among applicants and better support for conversion from religious institutions in the countries of asylum. The rise in applications further coincides with a broader practice change in this area based on jurisprudence from the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’), meaning that asylum applicants can no longer be required to conceal their faith or exercise discretion upon repatriation in order to avoid persecution. This practice change significantly changes how credibility assessments are carried out, insofar as the outcome of the case no longer depends solely on external circumstances, such as whether the conversion has already or is likely to come to the attention of authorities in the country of origin, but rather an assessment of the applicant’s subjective religious conviction.