2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02295842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An EM algorithm for fitting two-level structural equation models

Abstract: Chi-square statistic, mean and covariance structures, EM algorithm, maximum likelihood, multivariate normal distribution, two-level structural equation models,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For continuous data, maximum likelihood estimation has been proposed for unbalanced multilevel designs with missing items (Longford & Muthén, 1992), for example using an EM algorithm (Raudenbush, 1995;Lee & Tsang, 1999) or a generalization of the iterated generalized least squares algorithm (Yang, Pickles, & Taylor, 1999;Yang & Pickles, 2004). An EM algorithm for unbalanced continuous two-level data has recently been implemented in EQS (e.g., Liang & Bentler, 2003). For binary data, MCMC methods have been proposed by Ansari and Jedidi (2000) and Fox and Glas (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For continuous data, maximum likelihood estimation has been proposed for unbalanced multilevel designs with missing items (Longford & Muthén, 1992), for example using an EM algorithm (Raudenbush, 1995;Lee & Tsang, 1999) or a generalization of the iterated generalized least squares algorithm (Yang, Pickles, & Taylor, 1999;Yang & Pickles, 2004). An EM algorithm for unbalanced continuous two-level data has recently been implemented in EQS (e.g., Liang & Bentler, 2003). For binary data, MCMC methods have been proposed by Ansari and Jedidi (2000) and Fox and Glas (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard approach of assessing overall fit has this limitation because the sample size is usually much larger at the within-group level than at the betweengroup level. The ML fitting function for a two-level multilevel SEM is written as follows (Bentler & Liang, 2003;Liang & Bentler, 2004):…”
Section: Level-specific ML Test Statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent technical and computational developments have enabled the implementation of full information maximum likelihood (FIML) approaches to estimating disaggregated structural equation models with multilevel data (e.g., du Toit & du Toit, 2007;Lee & Poon, 1998;Liang & Bentler, 2004). In this article we use a large, nationally representative sample of law students to test substantive theory on the role of educational diversity in higher education settings and to identify some existing practical limitations of employing disaggregated multilevel structural equation models within a real-world data situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of quantitative researchers have published expository papers demonstrating empirical examples of the use of the MSEM procedure (e.g., Kaplan & Elliott, 1997;Liang & Bentler, 2004;B. O. Muthén, 1994;Muthén, Khoo, & Gustafsson, 1997;Skrondal & Rabe-Hesketh, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%