1989
DOI: 10.1080/00029890.1989.11972158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Elementary Test for the Galois Group of a Quartic Polynomial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we have the following facts from the field theory (cf. [2]). (i) G P ∼ = S 4 ⇔g x is irreducible over k t and ψ t / ∈ k t .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 23mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then we have the following facts from the field theory (cf. [2]). (i) G P ∼ = S 4 ⇔g x is irreducible over k t and ψ t / ∈ k t .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 23mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…, where x 0 x 1 x 2 are the homogeneous coordinates of 2 . Putting x = x 1 /x 0 , y = x 2 /x 0 , we have thatf x t = 1 − t 4 x 4 + 1 and G P ∼ = C 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall from [6] that the resolvent cubic of a quartic polynomial The next Lemma gives a general result useful for field discriminant calculations.…”
Section: Lemma 22 We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors use "quartic" and "biquadratic" as synonyms, we follow Kappe and Warren [5] (among others) and reserve the latter term for polynomials of this special type. We ask which among them are irreducible over Z yet reducible modulo p for each prime p. We also investigate in section 3 the additional property of being reducible modulo n for every integer n larger than 1.…”
Section: Biquadratic Polynomials Modulo P Our Attention In This Sectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of completeness, we appeal to [5] to show that the Galois group of f e (x) is A 4 for every integer e. As the discriminant of f e (x) is a perfect square, we know that its Galois group must be a subgroup of the alternating group The case p = 2 can be treated in a similar manner. We leave the details to the reader.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%