2007
DOI: 10.1088/1464-4258/9/10/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An elementary proof of the geometrical dependence of the Sagnac effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sagnac based ring laser gyros, which detect rotation by measuring frequency difference at the output, are limited by laser line-width. Moreover, the sensitivity of the Sagnac effect based gyroscopes is limited by the area [38] of the closed loop. The method described in this work do not depend on the dimensions of the optical path.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sagnac based ring laser gyros, which detect rotation by measuring frequency difference at the output, are limited by laser line-width. Moreover, the sensitivity of the Sagnac effect based gyroscopes is limited by the area [38] of the closed loop. The method described in this work do not depend on the dimensions of the optical path.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matter wave gyroscope has better sensitivity [51][52][53][54] when compared with FOG and ALG because of the short wavelength of matter wave in comparison with optical wave length. All the Sagnac effect based gyroscopes, like RLG, FOG, and matter wave gyroscopes, are dependent on the dimension of the Sagnac loop [55]. Unlike the Sagnac effect based gyroscopes, the atommechanical gyroscope do not depend on the dimensions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotation of the frame of reference induces a phase difference between the counter-rotating lights. The incurred phase difference ( ϕ Sagnac ) is proportional to the inner product of the area ( ⃗ A) of the loop and the angular velocity ( ⃗ Ω) that the frame of reference experiences, as expressed by the following equation [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%