2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/807/2/173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Elemental Assay of Very, Extremely, and Ultra-Metal-Poor Stars

Abstract: We present a high-resolution elemental-abundance analysis for a sample of 23 very metal-poor (VMP; [Fe/H] < −2.0) stars, 12 of which are extremely metal-poor (EMP; [Fe/H] < −3.0), and 4 of which are ultra metal-poor (UMP; [Fe/H] < −4.0). These stars were targeted to explore differences in the abundance ratios for elements that constrain the possible astrophysical sites of element production, including Li, C, N, O, the α-elements, the iron-peak elements, and a number of neutron-capture elements. This sample sub… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
127
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(94 reference statements)
8
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scatter has been found in numerous previous studies, and points towards differences in the formation sites and/or processes involved, if these processes are assumed to be robust and produce similar amounts of heavy elements in each event (see, e.g., Hansen et al 2014). Figure 7 compares the X-Shooter measurements of the [Sr/Fe], [Ba/Fe], and [Ba/Sr] abundance ratios for our programme stars to larger samples with high-resolution determinations from Hansen et al (2012Hansen et al ( , 2015, and Placco et al (2014b). As seen from these figures, the CEMP-no stars follow the general trend of stars without C-enhancement predicted by standard Galactic chemical evolution (GCE) models, while the CEMP-s stars increase the star-to-star scatter not just at extremely low metallicities, but over the entire range of [Fe/H].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This scatter has been found in numerous previous studies, and points towards differences in the formation sites and/or processes involved, if these processes are assumed to be robust and produce similar amounts of heavy elements in each event (see, e.g., Hansen et al 2014). Figure 7 compares the X-Shooter measurements of the [Sr/Fe], [Ba/Fe], and [Ba/Sr] abundance ratios for our programme stars to larger samples with high-resolution determinations from Hansen et al (2012Hansen et al ( , 2015, and Placco et al (2014b). As seen from these figures, the CEMP-no stars follow the general trend of stars without C-enhancement predicted by standard Galactic chemical evolution (GCE) models, while the CEMP-s stars increase the star-to-star scatter not just at extremely low metallicities, but over the entire range of [Fe/H].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Several studies have confirmed the existence of the carbon bands, and have populated them with more stars (e.g., Bonifacio et al 2015;Hansen et al 2015). Here we discuss the behaviour of the heavy elements and how they associate with these bands in order to better constrain the astrophysical sites and processes that enriched the different subclasses of CEMP stars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combined with the observed low 12 C/ 13 C ratios (see e.g. Ryan et al 2005 andHansen et al 2015a, and references therein), this points towards a large amount of mixing that is not included in their models. Recent work by Abate et al (2015a,b), employing models of AGB nucleosynthesis production from Karakas (2010), reaches better agreement for some stars, while for others they have the same problem as Bisterzo et al (2012).…”
Section: Nucleosynthesis Challengesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We present stellar atmospheric parameters and abundance estimates of [Fe/H] < λ < 5070 Å, 5220 < λ < 5280 Å and 5295 < λ < 5500 Å (to determine Fe); 5160 < λ < 5190 Å (to determine Mg abundances); and 3910 < λ < 3990 Å (for Ca abundances Yong et al 2013;Hansen et al 2015. Two scenarios were proposed for this chemical pattern: i) the results of mixing and processing of material due to stellar rotation, or ii) nucleosynthesis in mixing and fallback supernova models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%