2001
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/10.14.1455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An element in intron 1 of the CFTR gene augments intestinal expression in vivo

Abstract: The elements controlling the complex developmental and tissue-specific expression of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene lie outside the basal promoter region and have not been characterized. We previously identified a tissue-specific DNase I hypersensitive site (DHS) in intron 1 (185 + 10 kb) of the CFTR gene. Here we show that removal of the core element abolishes the activity of this DHS in transient transfection assays of reporter/enhancer gene constructs. We then compared e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, excised introns generally do not contribute to gene function, but D. melanogaster introns were aligned to and showed expression in non-melanogaster species. Here the conservation of intron sequence is consistent with functional constraint on intron evolution, possibly due to the regular presence of intronic splicing enhancers (Hare and Palumbi 2003;Xing and Lee 2006) and transcriptional enhancers (Banerji et al 1983;Rowntree et al 2001) rather than expression per se. If introns have little direct function as RNA-elements, then we might expect that the expression of most introns would be low, because most reads mapping to introns would be derived from incompletely processed transcripts.…”
Section: Caveatssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For example, excised introns generally do not contribute to gene function, but D. melanogaster introns were aligned to and showed expression in non-melanogaster species. Here the conservation of intron sequence is consistent with functional constraint on intron evolution, possibly due to the regular presence of intronic splicing enhancers (Hare and Palumbi 2003;Xing and Lee 2006) and transcriptional enhancers (Banerji et al 1983;Rowntree et al 2001) rather than expression per se. If introns have little direct function as RNA-elements, then we might expect that the expression of most introns would be low, because most reads mapping to introns would be derived from incompletely processed transcripts.…”
Section: Caveatssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Both colon carcinoma cell lines, Caco2 and HT29, also showed the ϩ15.6 kb DHS. A DHS in intron 1 (185 ϩ 10 kb) that we have previously shown to contain an intestinal-specific enhancer element in vitro and in vivo (19,(25)(26)(27) was detected in both Caco2 and HT29 cells. Additional cell-line specific DHS are evident in intron 10 (1716 ϩ 13.2 kb) in Caco2 cells and intron 18 (3600 ϩ 1.6 kb) in HT29.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Another example of a tissue-specific intronic enhancer is found in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator, where an element in intron 1 has been demonstrated to have an important role in regulating expression in the small intestine, but not lung, in transgenic mice [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%