1984
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5087(84)90223-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electrostatic separator for heavy recoil nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These distributions could be compared with the measured ones available from the literature to appreciate the validity of such simulations. However, one should mention that in this approach [16], as well as in those considered above [3][4][5][11][12][13][14], no comparisons of the simulated distributions with measured ones are presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These distributions could be compared with the measured ones available from the literature to appreciate the validity of such simulations. However, one should mention that in this approach [16], as well as in those considered above [3][4][5][11][12][13][14], no comparisons of the simulated distributions with measured ones are presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The calculated angular distributions were used for estimates of the performance of the recoil separator SHIP installed at the UNILAC accelerator in Darmstadt [3,4]. Later, simple formulae for estimates of parameters of angular and energy distributions for heavy ERs produced in compound nucleus (CN) reactions were published [5]. Those formulae imply a Gaussian form of angular and energy spreading for ERs due to light-particle emission from the CN followed by multiple scattering (MS) and energy loss of the ER in a target of finite thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…low and uncertain efficiency and -in several cases-restricted angular range. Another possibility has been the use of electrostatic deflectors which can separate ER from projectiles thanks to the very different electric rigidity of ones and the others [4][5][6][7][8]. However, the evaporation residues have a wide range in energy and charge state; thus, in these devices, they are deflected differently and not all of them are finally observed.…”
Section: Electrostatic Double-deflector and Its Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recoiling heavy fusion products were separated from the primary beam by an electrostatic deflector [3] and were implanted into a surface-barrier detector, which also registered their ground-state ~ decay. Electron-7 coincidences from the target were observed by means of a solenoid spectrometer and two Ge detectors at 90 ~ with respect to the beam direction, while 77 coincidences and 7 angular distributions were measured in an arrangement of six compton-suppressed Ge detectors positioned at 90 ~ and 145 ~ relative to the beam.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%