Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2004.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electrostatic focusing ion guide for ion mobility-mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29,33 If the width of the ion packets exceeds the inner diameter of the drift tube prior to its arrival at the IMS terminus, then ions are lost and ion transmission efficiency is reduced. The transmission efficiency through the IMS space alone was assumed to be 100% when Tang et al demonstrated near-perfect ion transfer through an ion funnel interface for ESI-IMS-MS. 34 Sysoev el al also concluded ion loss during transmission through IMS tube was minimal when they obtained similar signals with and without a modular IMS inserted between ESI-MS. 35 Gillig et al simulated ion trajectories inside the drift tube and showed that ions were transferred without any loss through the drift tube when they reported an ion focusing guide for MALDI-IMS-MS. 36 However to our knowledge, no direct empirical data has been reported to demonstrate ion transmission is close to 100% in IMS tube.…”
Section: Ion Transmission In Esi-imsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…29,33 If the width of the ion packets exceeds the inner diameter of the drift tube prior to its arrival at the IMS terminus, then ions are lost and ion transmission efficiency is reduced. The transmission efficiency through the IMS space alone was assumed to be 100% when Tang et al demonstrated near-perfect ion transfer through an ion funnel interface for ESI-IMS-MS. 34 Sysoev el al also concluded ion loss during transmission through IMS tube was minimal when they obtained similar signals with and without a modular IMS inserted between ESI-MS. 35 Gillig et al simulated ion trajectories inside the drift tube and showed that ions were transferred without any loss through the drift tube when they reported an ion focusing guide for MALDI-IMS-MS. 36 However to our knowledge, no direct empirical data has been reported to demonstrate ion transmission is close to 100% in IMS tube.…”
Section: Ion Transmission In Esi-imsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When a collision occurs, the particle masses and scattering cross sections are calculated by the model code. The hard-sphere models [54,55] were used to determine the post-collisional ion velocity. The columbic repulsion effect was also considered in this model with a factor repulsion method.…”
Section: Cfd-monte Carlo Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The renewed interest coincided with technological advances afforded by the analytical refinement of orthogonal TOF instruments [7], efficient transfer of ions from high pressure ion sources to vacuum [8], the development of low-pressure (less than 10 Torr) drift tube designs, which are more easily adapted to high vacuum mass spectrometers and ionization techniques capable of forming intact biomolecular ions. In addition, elevated pressure ion focusing strategies such as electrostatic ion guides [9] or electrodynamic rf fields [10][11][12] have greatly improved the ion transmission of the ion mobility spectrometer, and the recently introduced traveling-wave ion mobility instrument utilizing high resolution orthogonal TOF mass analysis has enormous potential for a broad range of studies from small molecules to macromolecules, includ-ing MDa protein complexes [13]. Despite the development of these novel IM technologies, the traditional uniform field drift tube IM continues to provide the most reliable determinations of ion-neutral collision cross sections and performs with the highest achievable ion mobility resolving powers [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%