1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00102-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electrophysiological characterization of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons during differential pavlovian fear conditioning in the awake rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
118
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in terms of absolute magnitude, the increase was relatively week (~12 imp/s). This response pattern well agrees with preferential excitations of presumed DA neurons induced by arousing somato-sensory stimuli in awake animals, as shown both in the SNc (Freeman et al, 1985;Freeman and Bunney, 1987;Steinfels et al, 1983;Strecker et al, 1985;Schultz, 1986;Trulson, 1985) and VTA (Guarraci and Kapp, 1999;Freeman and Bunney, 1987;Kiyatkin, 1988;Horvitz et al, 1997;Schultz, 1986). These data are also consistent with large body of neurochemical data (DA metabolism, [DA] evaluated by microdialysis or electrochemistry) suggesting increased DA release, especially in cortical projections, associated with arousing and aversive stimulation (Abercrombie et al, 1989;Deutch et al, 1985;Fadda et al, 1978;Feenstra et al, 2000Feenstra et al, , 2001Kiyatkin, 1995;Le Moal and Simon, 1991;Thierry et al, 1976).…”
Section: Sensory Responses Of Ls and Ss Vta Neuronssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, in terms of absolute magnitude, the increase was relatively week (~12 imp/s). This response pattern well agrees with preferential excitations of presumed DA neurons induced by arousing somato-sensory stimuli in awake animals, as shown both in the SNc (Freeman et al, 1985;Freeman and Bunney, 1987;Steinfels et al, 1983;Strecker et al, 1985;Schultz, 1986;Trulson, 1985) and VTA (Guarraci and Kapp, 1999;Freeman and Bunney, 1987;Kiyatkin, 1988;Horvitz et al, 1997;Schultz, 1986). These data are also consistent with large body of neurochemical data (DA metabolism, [DA] evaluated by microdialysis or electrochemistry) suggesting increased DA release, especially in cortical projections, associated with arousing and aversive stimulation (Abercrombie et al, 1989;Deutch et al, 1985;Fadda et al, 1978;Feenstra et al, 2000Feenstra et al, , 2001Kiyatkin, 1995;Le Moal and Simon, 1991;Thierry et al, 1976).…”
Section: Sensory Responses Of Ls and Ss Vta Neuronssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Dopaminergic activity also falls below baseline when the monkey is presented with a stimulus that predicts punishment (Mirenowicz & Schultz, 1996; but see Guarraci & Kapp, 1999).…”
Section: The Mesencephalic Dopamine Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those that give rise to mesolimbocortical DA pathways, respond to each of these types of salient events [57]. Single-unit recordings have demonstrated that VTA DA neurons show phasic elevations in activity in response to novel events [72], unexpected rewards [72,79], conditioned predictors of reward [72,79], primary and conditioned aversive stimuli [46,66] but see [80], and high intensity auditory and visual events with neither conditioned reward nor aversive properties [59].…”
Section: Da Neurons Respond To Salient Unexpected Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If DA neurons are similarly activated by the onset of aversive events, the scenario becomes less plausible, for it would lead to the strengthening of behavioral responses that lead to the onset of aversive consequences. While there is evidence to suggest that the DA response to reward events may be in some way distinct from the DA response to aversive events [14,74,80,102], other evidence suggests that the DA response to reward and aversive event onset is likely to be similar, given that the events are of comparable intensity or significance [46,57,66,99]. If DA neurons respond to surprising/arousing events, regardless of appetitive or aversive value, one would postulate that DA activation does not serve to increase the likelihood that a given behavioral response is repeated under similar input conditions; that is to say, the primary function of DA in striatal plasticity is unlikely to involve a strengthening of stimulus Á/response (SÁ/R) connections.…”
Section: Da Activity Gates the Throughput Of Sensorimotor And Incentimentioning
confidence: 99%