1983
DOI: 10.2323/jgam.29.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electrophoretic comparison of the enzymes of Saccharomyces yeasts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1986
1986
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results differ from those obtained by other authors in studies on the electrophoretic mobility of isoenzymes in the species examined of the genus Saccharomyces as they generally present a greater intraspecific diversity in patterns and fail to separate the four species belonging to Succhuromyces senm stricto (Subden et al, 1982;Yamazaki et al, 1983;Poncet et al, 1992;Lewicka et al, 1995). The experimental conditions, namely the use of certified strains and the time of harvesting the cells, may account for the consistency of these results.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Isoenzyme Profilescontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results differ from those obtained by other authors in studies on the electrophoretic mobility of isoenzymes in the species examined of the genus Saccharomyces as they generally present a greater intraspecific diversity in patterns and fail to separate the four species belonging to Succhuromyces senm stricto (Subden et al, 1982;Yamazaki et al, 1983;Poncet et al, 1992;Lewicka et al, 1995). The experimental conditions, namely the use of certified strains and the time of harvesting the cells, may account for the consistency of these results.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Isoenzyme Profilescontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…1). In similar studies, based on a higher number of enzymes, the authors report as many different ETs as the number of strains under study (Subden et al, 1982;Yamazaki et al, 1983;Poncet et al, 1992). In contrast, Lewicka et al (1995) in studies of genetic diversity based on multilocus starch electrophoresis of seven isoenzymes described 11 different ETs for 27 strains of S. cerevisiae, which is in accordance with our results and indicates that the discriminatory power of the enzymes varies significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these the detected number of enzymes was 3 or less, so they were excluded from the analysis on the ground that they would lead to noticeable error because of scarce input data. YAMAZAKI and KOMAGATA (8-10), YAMAZAKI et al (11,12), and YAMAZAKI and GoTo (13) reported that the electrophoretic comparison of enzymes was a useful tool for determining the taxonomical relations at the species level. Our research showed a high similarity value (87-100%) among the strains within the following species: 12 strains of Saccharomycopsis lipolytica, 4 of Saccharomycopsis fibuligera, 2 of Saccharomycopsis crataegensis, 2 of Stephanoascus ciferrii, 2 of Cephaloascus fragrans, and 2 of Guilliermondella selenospora.…”
Section: And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reclassification of ascoideaceous yeasts has mainly been examined and discussed in terms of morphology, but scholars have yet to agree on all classifications (1,4,6,7). In recent years, YAMAZAKI and KOMAGATA (8-10), YAMAZAKI et al (11,12), and YAMAZAKI and GoTo (13) reported that electrophoretic comparison of enzymes is a useful tool for determining the taxonomic relations of various yeasts at the species level. YAMADA and KoNDO (14), YAMADA et al (15,16), and YAMADA and SMITH (17) reported that the coenzyme Q (ubiquinone) system was well correlated with the groupings of the ascomycetous yeast genera.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%